Housing Must Be A Bad Investment
Challenging Australia’s property wealth mindset
The Money Café with Alan Kohler
May 13, 2026 · 45 min · 19 segments
On The Money Café this week, Alan Kohler and James Thomson dig into the federal budget, take stock of CSL, and tackle listener questions on tax, AI, and interest rates. Special offer for Money Café…
Alan KohlerHostNo entities detected.
I mean, I, I think the, the, the sort of general idea here is i- if you, if you've ever been to a ASX AGM, you'll know that, um, the, the, the audience is usually made up of older, wealthier shareholders, and they are being hit through the combination of changes to capital gains tax, negative gearing, and the taxation of trusts.
And this is designed to, i- in, in the words of Treasurer Jim Chalmers, to, you know, make it easier for first home buyers to get into the market by ensuring they have less, um, uh, less competition from investors.
And generally trying to tilt, equalize the, level the playing field, I guess, i- in terms of the taxation of income and capital.
Uh, y- you know, I, I think the application of the CGT changes and the negative gearing changes to property is good.
Uh, ma- perhaps the, the application of those changes to invest other asset classes like equities and certainly, um, early stage capital is a worry.
Um, and there's this general [laughs] question of how much intergenerational fairness is created when you grandfather all these rules.
Because in, in, in one way, as, as several critics have pointed out in the last couple of weeks, and particularly in, in response to the budget, you could see this as an older generation pulling the ladder up behind them.
They've grandfathered and locked in all the, uh, very advantageous tax treatment of their investments, and now younger investors going forward won't be able to access that same very advantageous tax treatment.
It's, it's remarkable the number of people who said to me in the budget lockup, "I wonder what Alan Kohler will think of the changes around housing." Because there is a sense here that housing as an investment, the government is saying, "We don't want housing to be as, uh, profitable as an investment as it has been." And you dig into the budget papers, the government's also bravely saying, "We're happy to see house prices go backwards" –
... which is something I, I don't think we've seen a, a, a government say in a very long time.
I mean, I, I think the, the, the sort of general idea here is i- if you, if you've ever been to a ASX AGM, you'll know that, um, the, the, the audience is usually made up of older, wealthier shareholders, and they are being hit through the combination of changes to capital gains tax, negative gearing, and the taxation of trusts.
And this is designed to, i- in, in the words of Treasurer Jim Chalmers, to, you know, make it easier for first home buyers to get into the market by ensuring they have less, um, uh, less competition from investors.
And generally trying to tilt, equalize the, level the playing field, I guess, i- in terms of the taxation of income and capital.
Uh, y- you know, I, I think the application of the CGT changes and the negative gearing changes to property is good.
Uh, ma- perhaps the, the application of those changes to invest other asset classes like equities and certainly, um, early stage capital is a worry.
Um, and there's this general [laughs] question of how much intergenerational fairness is created when you grandfather all these rules.
Because in, in, in one way, as, as several critics have pointed out in the last couple of weeks, and particularly in, in response to the budget, you could see this as an older generation pulling the ladder up behind them.
They've grandfathered and locked in all the, uh, very advantageous tax treatment of their investments, and now younger investors going forward won't be able to access that same very advantageous tax treatment.
It's, it's remarkable the number of people who said to me in the budget lockup, "I wonder what Alan Kohler will think of the changes around housing." Because there is a sense here that housing as an investment, the government is saying, "We don't want housing to be as, uh, profitable as an investment as it has been." And you dig into the budget papers, the government's also bravely saying, "We're happy to see house prices go backwards" –
... which is something I, I don't think we've seen a, a, a government say in a very long time.
Every episode on Radar is fully transcribed, speaker-labeled, and rich with metadata. Here is a taste of this one. Try Radar for free to see the rest.
3 of 10
Housing Must Be A Bad Investment
Challenging Australia’s property wealth mindset
Government Ready For Falling Prices
A rare admission about home prices
Stimulatory Budget, RBA Headache
Unpacking what the budget really does
+7 more clips · 6 min 47 sec of audio in all
7 of 25
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
All 10 clips — the highlight moments, each cut as its own audio, with a title and a speaker
All 19 segments — the transcript broken into labeled sections, every ad read marked
All 25 topics — jump to every other episode discussing the same subject
Every related episode — other shows Radar links to this one
No account is needed to search Radar.