Leigh MorrisGuestJohn SaadeHost
And I guess when you've got a breadwinner, we're just saying it's the breadwinner tax because that person that makes the money is being taxed more – than what would be if two individuals worked for the same amount of money.

Let's say the husband was out making $300,000 a year working FIFO or something and the wife was at home with the children.

The issue I had with that is that we are forcing with the way that the cost of living, the way that property prices, it's very hard in itself to find a $300,000 job.

So usually what happens is you're forcing both the husband and the wife to to go to work, what does that mean when you have children? Somebody else is looking after them.

And so any tax benefit that you have gained from both people working full-time and not seeing their children is taken away by childcare, which is great, I mean, for productivity for the government, but at an individual level it sucks.

And it disproportionately affects women because usually they're the caretakers because, you know, when you have a baby, you know, even with my wife, I couldn't breastfeed.

So we made the decision, you know, you stay at home for this first six months to a year and I'll go out and work.

But what you can find later on down the track is If the husband and wife gets divorced, the superannuation can often lack for the woman and they don't have retirement savings anymore.
The other thing is the childcare subsidy is almost not there when it's the one high-income earner.

And I guess when you've got a breadwinner, we're just saying it's the breadwinner tax because that person that makes the money is being taxed more – than what would be if two individuals worked for the same amount of money.

Let's say the husband was out making $300,000 a year working FIFO or something and the wife was at home with the children.

The issue I had with that is that we are forcing with the way that the cost of living, the way that property prices, it's very hard in itself to find a $300,000 job.

So usually what happens is you're forcing both the husband and the wife to to go to work, what does that mean when you have children? Somebody else is looking after them.

And so any tax benefit that you have gained from both people working full-time and not seeing their children is taken away by childcare, which is great, I mean, for productivity for the government, but at an individual level it sucks.

And it disproportionately affects women because usually they're the caretakers because, you know, when you have a baby, you know, even with my wife, I couldn't breastfeed.

So we made the decision, you know, you stay at home for this first six months to a year and I'll go out and work.

But what you can find later on down the track is If the husband and wife gets divorced, the superannuation can often lack for the woman and they don't have retirement savings anymore.
The other thing is the childcare subsidy is almost not there when it's the one high-income earner.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.