Sep 16, 2026 · 53 min · 11 segments
The Lindsay Clancy case has sparked intense debate over mental illness, criminal responsibility, postpartum psychosis, and the meaning of justice. In this episode of The Issues Podcast, Stephen…
Stephen RussHost
Martin WickensHostTomGuest
When I first saw it, I was like, why are we talking about that? And then I realized that there is so much disagreement and so much what people might refer to as nuance in the conversation.
And I don't know about you guys, but I've seen people, good people, people I would think are good-hearted people who disagree on this.
So we decided that today would be a good time to talk about it because it is in the news.
So Martin, I think your job for the next couple of moments or 20 minutes or however long you want to take with this is just to kind of give an overview of the situation and maybe tell us what you know.
So because of the nature of the case, you know, for maybe our younger listeners, they might want to check with their parents before they listen too much further.
And because there are so many different parts of this conversation, I would ask that you kind of give us time to develop the thoughts before you react, because there are, you know, a lot of extremes here and it's a very sensitive issue.
But just the basics of the case, and I believe what I'll share here are kind of the indisputable parts of it.
But basically, Lindsay Clancy was a Massachusetts mother and former nurse who, on January 24th, 2023, murdered her three children using exercise bands.
And we're not going to go into, I think, unnecessary detail, but I think we do need to be aware of how violent and deliberate and premeditated that murder was.
She had three children, Cora, a five-year-old, Dawson, who was three, and then Callan, who was eight months.
And one by one, she murdered all three of them, strangled them, which is one of the most brutal ways to take another person's life because you literally feel the breath leaving them and the pulse slowing down.
They, all three, I think, you know, arrived at the hospital in cardiac arrest, but soon after died, I think the youngest, the eight-month-old, they were able to restart his heart, but he never regained consciousness or the ability to breathe independently, and there were no brainwaves, and he died three days later.
Immediately after trying to take the life of her three kids, she cut herself and then jumped from a second story window in what is presumed to be a suicide attempt and that left her alive and paralyzed from the waist down.
And as far as the legal side of it, she's never disputed that she killed the children.
But I know there's a large group who believe that she didn't do it, that she was being framed and brainwashed and whatever else.
But she and her defense never tried to dispute that she was the one who committed the crime.
And so the central issue hasn't been whether or not she did it, but why and whether or not she was legally responsible.
The defense's primary position seemed to be to base it upon postpartum mental illness and psychosis.
And so therefore was responsible, but not criminally responsible and therefore shouldn't be prosecuted on that basis.
When I first saw it, I was like, why are we talking about that? And then I realized that there is so much disagreement and so much what people might refer to as nuance in the conversation.
And I don't know about you guys, but I've seen people, good people, people I would think are good-hearted people who disagree on this.
So we decided that today would be a good time to talk about it because it is in the news.
So Martin, I think your job for the next couple of moments or 20 minutes or however long you want to take with this is just to kind of give an overview of the situation and maybe tell us what you know.
So because of the nature of the case, you know, for maybe our younger listeners, they might want to check with their parents before they listen too much further.
And because there are so many different parts of this conversation, I would ask that you kind of give us time to develop the thoughts before you react, because there are, you know, a lot of extremes here and it's a very sensitive issue.
But just the basics of the case, and I believe what I'll share here are kind of the indisputable parts of it.
But basically, Lindsay Clancy was a Massachusetts mother and former nurse who, on January 24th, 2023, murdered her three children using exercise bands.
And we're not going to go into, I think, unnecessary detail, but I think we do need to be aware of how violent and deliberate and premeditated that murder was.
She had three children, Cora, a five-year-old, Dawson, who was three, and then Callan, who was eight months.
And one by one, she murdered all three of them, strangled them, which is one of the most brutal ways to take another person's life because you literally feel the breath leaving them and the pulse slowing down.
They, all three, I think, you know, arrived at the hospital in cardiac arrest, but soon after died, I think the youngest, the eight-month-old, they were able to restart his heart, but he never regained consciousness or the ability to breathe independently, and there were no brainwaves, and he died three days later.
Immediately after trying to take the life of her three kids, she cut herself and then jumped from a second story window in what is presumed to be a suicide attempt and that left her alive and paralyzed from the waist down.
And as far as the legal side of it, she's never disputed that she killed the children.
But I know there's a large group who believe that she didn't do it, that she was being framed and brainwashed and whatever else.
But she and her defense never tried to dispute that she was the one who committed the crime.
And so the central issue hasn't been whether or not she did it, but why and whether or not she was legally responsible.
The defense's primary position seemed to be to base it upon postpartum mental illness and psychosis.
And so therefore was responsible, but not criminally responsible and therefore shouldn't be prosecuted on that basis.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
