The FIR Podcast Network Everything Feed
Sep 28, 2026 · 21 min · 8 segments
AI has evolved enough now that one-shotting entire deliverables is tempting, and many people online claim to be doing just that. In this episode, Chip and Gini discuss why that’s a bad idea, and how…
Chip GriffinHost
Gini DietrichHostBecause you
And you need to figure out what you're putting out actually makes sense, whether that's to an internal audience, whether you're digesting it yourself to make decisions, whether you're giving it to a client or publishing it, whatever it is, you need to be paying attention to it.
And I have gotten one too many bits of material sent to me in recent weeks that has had no human intelligence applied to it whatsoever.
Not in the preparation of it, not in the editing of it, I guess in the delivery, the hitting of send.
Maybe.
Maybe I did that, too.
I don't I don't
I mean, that's that's generally speaking, the people who are at that level where you can actually send it have at least given it some of the context in advance to help guide it.
First of all, in many cases, they didn't because when you see it and the result is actually good, chances are they built up a whole lot of context within their own personal AI in advance.
So it's, is it one-shotted? Sort of, but it's based on a whole pile of information.
That's like saying that you one-shotted an article on the Peso model, right? okay, sure, you sat down and wrote it all at once and it's great, but that's because of all of the years you spent developing it.
And we're just, we need to, as excited as we are about AI, we need to figure out how to balance in the human judgment piece.
Because you
And you need to figure out what you're putting out actually makes sense, whether that's to an internal audience, whether you're digesting it yourself to make decisions, whether you're giving it to a client or publishing it, whatever it is, you need to be paying attention to it.
And I have gotten one too many bits of material sent to me in recent weeks that has had no human intelligence applied to it whatsoever.
Not in the preparation of it, not in the editing of it, I guess in the delivery, the hitting of send.
Maybe.
Maybe I did that, too.
I don't I don't
I mean, that's that's generally speaking, the people who are at that level where you can actually send it have at least given it some of the context in advance to help guide it.
First of all, in many cases, they didn't because when you see it and the result is actually good, chances are they built up a whole lot of context within their own personal AI in advance.
So it's, is it one-shotted? Sort of, but it's based on a whole pile of information.
That's like saying that you one-shotted an article on the Peso model, right? okay, sure, you sat down and wrote it all at once and it's great, but that's because of all of the years you spent developing it.
And we're just, we need to, as excited as we are about AI, we need to figure out how to balance in the human judgment piece.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
