Oct 1, 2026 · 31 min · 9 segments
Jordan Klepper breaks down the headlines, including an AI summit in Washington that left us with exactly the same amount of federal AI regulation (read: none). Plus, former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith…
Jordan KlepperHost
[upbeat music] Yesterday, after weeks of alarming headlines about artificial intelligence, Trump hosted all the major tech CEOs at the White House.
It was like the Last Supper if everyone there believed they were the Son of God.
[laughs]
And I, for one, am glad they had this summit because I assume it means we'll finally be getting federal guardrails on AI.
There will be no federal guardrails on AI.
[laughs]
President Trump declaring AI leaders should police themselves.
[laughs]
You want them to police themselves? Zuckerberg can't even police my aunt from commenting on all of my pictures.
[laughs]
[laughs]
So if there aren't going to be actual regulations, what did they come up with instead?
Instead, several companies have signed a voluntary joint agreement suggesting industry leaders should implement internal measures to monitor and check their own AI models.
Is it binding in any way?
I think it's morally binding, yeah.
[laughs]
[laughs]
[upbeat music] Yesterday, after weeks of alarming headlines about artificial intelligence, Trump hosted all the major tech CEOs at the White House.
It was like the Last Supper if everyone there believed they were the Son of God.
[laughs]
And I, for one, am glad they had this summit because I assume it means we'll finally be getting federal guardrails on AI.
There will be no federal guardrails on AI.
[laughs]
President Trump declaring AI leaders should police themselves.
[laughs]
You want them to police themselves? Zuckerberg can't even police my aunt from commenting on all of my pictures.
[laughs]
[laughs]
So if there aren't going to be actual regulations, what did they come up with instead?
Instead, several companies have signed a voluntary joint agreement suggesting industry leaders should implement internal measures to monitor and check their own AI models.
Is it binding in any way?
I think it's morally binding, yeah.
[laughs]
[laughs]
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.