Sep 17, 2026 · 30 min · 11 segments
In this episode of the "Point-of-Sale Finance" series, Jason Cover is joined by colleagues Erin Edwards and Simon Fleischmann from Troutman Pepper Locke's Consumer Financial Services practice to shift…
Simon FleischmannGuestErin EdwardsGuest
Jason CoverHost
Today, we're going to talk about a deceptively simple moment, which is just checkout.
That point of sale moment now involves a no interest, paying for buy now, pay later product, or it could involve a longer term embedded financing, a retail installment product, or a private label retail card application.
The litigation risk often turns less on the product label and more on what the consumer saw, what the consumer was told, whether a credit report was pulled, what disclosures were provided, and what happened later when the consumer disputed a charge, returned merchandise, missed an auto pay, or saw something reported to a credit bureau.
And I bring that up just because the withdrawal of that rule does not make the risk disappear because there are still FCRA claims, TILA theories, state UDAP laws, there's retail installment laws, private litigation, state regulatory activity, and merchant lender contract disputes that remain very much in play.
So our goal for this episode is to try to be practical with your listeners.
We want to help lenders, merchants, platforms, and practitioners spot where point of sale litigation trends are going and just where those issues start and identify the controls that can keep a small checkout dispute from becoming a regulatory issue, a credit reporting case, or a class action.
And so a useful starting point is to broaden the lens from BNPL to the larger
And I think one of the things we really stress and continue to stress with clients that we've seen is, is that kind of application process at point of sale effective? and what the consumer understands.
You've seen this in like rent to own, where one of the common refrains is that folks didn't realize it was a rent to own transaction.
I've personally seen our BNPL clients do a great job of explaining how that pay in for transaction works on screen.
I'm always really impressed how this is probably not lawyers doing it, or at least it's not me doing it, but really simplifying the legalese and how that transaction works into something very simple that folks can understand on screen.
I'm glad to hear that that's what our clients are doing, because that could really make all the difference in the world in a litigation matter.
You know, Simon, you kind of tailed off there with BNPL expanding into everything almost.
Today, we're going to talk about a deceptively simple moment, which is just checkout.
That point of sale moment now involves a no interest, paying for buy now, pay later product, or it could involve a longer term embedded financing, a retail installment product, or a private label retail card application.
The litigation risk often turns less on the product label and more on what the consumer saw, what the consumer was told, whether a credit report was pulled, what disclosures were provided, and what happened later when the consumer disputed a charge, returned merchandise, missed an auto pay, or saw something reported to a credit bureau.
And I bring that up just because the withdrawal of that rule does not make the risk disappear because there are still FCRA claims, TILA theories, state UDAP laws, there's retail installment laws, private litigation, state regulatory activity, and merchant lender contract disputes that remain very much in play.
So our goal for this episode is to try to be practical with your listeners.
We want to help lenders, merchants, platforms, and practitioners spot where point of sale litigation trends are going and just where those issues start and identify the controls that can keep a small checkout dispute from becoming a regulatory issue, a credit reporting case, or a class action.
And so a useful starting point is to broaden the lens from BNPL to the larger
And I think one of the things we really stress and continue to stress with clients that we've seen is, is that kind of application process at point of sale effective? and what the consumer understands.
You've seen this in like rent to own, where one of the common refrains is that folks didn't realize it was a rent to own transaction.
I've personally seen our BNPL clients do a great job of explaining how that pay in for transaction works on screen.
I'm always really impressed how this is probably not lawyers doing it, or at least it's not me doing it, but really simplifying the legalese and how that transaction works into something very simple that folks can understand on screen.
I'm glad to hear that that's what our clients are doing, because that could really make all the difference in the world in a litigation matter.
You know, Simon, you kind of tailed off there with BNPL expanding into everything almost.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
