The BDBF Podcast: News and Insights for the Employment Law Community
Jul 6, 2026 · 23 min · 10 segments
**When fundamental rights collide in the workplace, how do courts decide who wins?** In this episode of The BDBF Podcast, Partner **Clare Brereton** and Senior Associate **Leigh Janes** examine the…
Leigh JanesGuest
Clare BreretonHost
Today we're going to be discussing the case of Amuba against Michael Garrett Associates Ltd and Leicester Theatre Trust Ltd.

Now, Lee, this is a case that forms part of the body of case law about the so-called clash of rights that's taking place in workplaces.

And as we'll come on to discuss, this often involves issues where people express certain beliefs based in their religious beliefs, typically relating to homosexuality or gender-critical views.

And how that impacts other people that they work with, or actually in this case, the wider public.

But as we're also going to go on to discuss, this is slightly different to some of the cases that we've discussed before on the podcast because this judgment today is not so much about the substance of the case or the law as it applies to the facts, but positions in which parties are able to appeal decisions to the appellant courts.

Yeah, it's certainly a little bit different, although, as you say, the issues are very different.

Today we're going to be discussing the case of Amuba against Michael Garrett Associates Ltd and Leicester Theatre Trust Ltd.

Now, Lee, this is a case that forms part of the body of case law about the so-called clash of rights that's taking place in workplaces.

And as we'll come on to discuss, this often involves issues where people express certain beliefs based in their religious beliefs, typically relating to homosexuality or gender-critical views.

And how that impacts other people that they work with, or actually in this case, the wider public.

But as we're also going to go on to discuss, this is slightly different to some of the cases that we've discussed before on the podcast because this judgment today is not so much about the substance of the case or the law as it applies to the facts, but positions in which parties are able to appeal decisions to the appellant courts.

Yeah, it's certainly a little bit different, although, as you say, the issues are very different.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.