Jordan Samuel FlemingHostThere's an assumption being made right now about AI that I think is gonna cause a lot of businesses problems.
If I take part of my business that is currently being done by people and I put an AI agent into it who can work faster, handle more volume, and operate almost continuously, then I've created leverage.
And on the surface, that makes perfect sense, but I don't think that's actually how leverage works with AI.
Because you can't put digital employees with almost limitless capacity into a business that was designed around the limitations of human labor and then expect that business to suddenly scale.
They can have hundreds or potentially thousands of conversations happening simultaneously.
And because of that, they start producing significantly more opportunities.
And that sounds fantastic, right? I mean, you've just created leverage, right? Well, maybe not, because what happens next? Let's say that before you introduced the AI sales agent, your sales process was designed around five human salespeople.
Now, those five people could generate and manage a certain number of conversations.
And over time, the rest of your business evolved around that level of output.
Maybe they would collectively produce 50 qualified opportunities every week.
Now, those opportunities would then be passed to another person or another team.
Everything worked because the capacity of one part of the organization broadly matched the capacity of the next.
What happens? What happens? You haven't necessarily created 10 times the leverage.
You may have created 10 times the problem because the next stage of your process, that was never designed to handle 500 opportunities.
There's an assumption being made right now about AI that I think is gonna cause a lot of businesses problems.
If I take part of my business that is currently being done by people and I put an AI agent into it who can work faster, handle more volume, and operate almost continuously, then I've created leverage.
And on the surface, that makes perfect sense, but I don't think that's actually how leverage works with AI.
Because you can't put digital employees with almost limitless capacity into a business that was designed around the limitations of human labor and then expect that business to suddenly scale.
They can have hundreds or potentially thousands of conversations happening simultaneously.
And because of that, they start producing significantly more opportunities.
And that sounds fantastic, right? I mean, you've just created leverage, right? Well, maybe not, because what happens next? Let's say that before you introduced the AI sales agent, your sales process was designed around five human salespeople.
Now, those five people could generate and manage a certain number of conversations.
And over time, the rest of your business evolved around that level of output.
Maybe they would collectively produce 50 qualified opportunities every week.
Now, those opportunities would then be passed to another person or another team.
Everything worked because the capacity of one part of the organization broadly matched the capacity of the next.
What happens? What happens? You haven't necessarily created 10 times the leverage.
You may have created 10 times the problem because the next stage of your process, that was never designed to handle 500 opportunities.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.