Tim BeveridgeHost
Martin HawesGuest
The usual comment from me as well, You don't have to have the answer to the meaning of life that's going to solve all our problems with your one magnificent call.

Almost sounds like a slogan, doesn't it? Anyway, there has been a suggestion that sort of popped up in our conversation as we're getting ready for the week.

There's a proposal to shake up the way we use superannuation, and it's from the Chartered Accountants of Australia and New Zealand, and it's talking about having a flexible choice of when people can start receiving New Zealand super.

But the idea might be that you might delay receiving your super because you're still earning a living.

I mean, for how many people is 65 the day that they stop working? I'm not sure.

So there's some modelling that suggests that you spread the uptake over the first five years and maybe you opt out of receiving it earlier and return for a bit more later on.

Would you opt to receive money later if you could maybe get a little bit more at the time? It still can't be worth it.

I mean, they're always banking on how long you're going to live, aren't they? That's the whole game.

But anyway, to discuss that and other things, because the other question we've got to look at is there are a lot of people I know who are thinking, oh, my KiwiSaver's not that flash, but what's going to happen is I'm going to sell the house and I'm going to downsize, move to another town, and that's my retirement.

The usual comment from me as well, You don't have to have the answer to the meaning of life that's going to solve all our problems with your one magnificent call.

Almost sounds like a slogan, doesn't it? Anyway, there has been a suggestion that sort of popped up in our conversation as we're getting ready for the week.

There's a proposal to shake up the way we use superannuation, and it's from the Chartered Accountants of Australia and New Zealand, and it's talking about having a flexible choice of when people can start receiving New Zealand super.

But the idea might be that you might delay receiving your super because you're still earning a living.

I mean, for how many people is 65 the day that they stop working? I'm not sure.

So there's some modelling that suggests that you spread the uptake over the first five years and maybe you opt out of receiving it earlier and return for a bit more later on.

Would you opt to receive money later if you could maybe get a little bit more at the time? It still can't be worth it.

I mean, they're always banking on how long you're going to live, aren't they? That's the whole game.

But anyway, to discuss that and other things, because the other question we've got to look at is there are a lot of people I know who are thinking, oh, my KiwiSaver's not that flash, but what's going to happen is I'm going to sell the house and I'm going to downsize, move to another town, and that's my retirement.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.