Listener sentiment
Skeptics with a K continues to earn overwhelmingly positive reviews, with long-time listeners — many subscribed for a decade or more — praising the show as the gold standard of skeptical podcasting. Reviewers consistently highlight the chemistry between hosts Mike Hall, Michael Marshall, and Dr. Alice Howarth, the well-researched deep dives into pseudoscience and bad science reporting, and the signature blend of rigorous analysis with irreverent Liverpool humor. The recent shift to a weekly release schedule has been warmly received, with several veteran listeners saying the tighter cadence has sharpened the content after a period when episodes felt weighed down by extended personal chat. A recurring thread of criticism, visible across multiple years but representing a small minority of reviews, centers on perceived political bias — some listeners feel the hosts apply skepticism selectively, scrutinizing fringe claims more rigorously than progressive positions — and a handful of recent reviewers have flagged concerns about factual accuracy on topics such as nutrition. On balance, the dominant sentiment is one of deep loyalty and admiration from a committed listener base that values the show both as entertainment and as a genuine tool for sharpening critical thinking.
Apple4.8 · 491
Summary generated Aug 27, 2026
