Jun 19, 2026 · 40 min · 14 segments
One parent tells you not to speak to the other. An estranged parent suddenly turns up for collection. Who do you listen to? What does the law actually say? And how do you stay child-focused…
No entities detected.
Brian FraserGuest
Chris EastHost
Earlier last week, I decided to put out on Facebook and LinkedIn a question saying that we're going to be interviewing today.

Was there any questions people might have on a legal basis when it comes to working as a DSL, predominantly in schools? And while these questions are tailored specifically to schools, they still apply directly to various other organizations as well.

But as DSLs, we often receive information about court orders relating to children.

Can you just briefly explain the types of orders that will be provided to schools?

So there's two sort of different areas in which the school might see court orders.

One is predominantly in relation to the children themselves, things like child arrangements orders, specific issue orders or prohibited steps orders.

But you also might have a school seeing some injunction orders such as non-molestation orders.

In order to really explain why these orders are in place, it's worth taking a step back and talking about something called parental responsibility.

It comes from a piece of legislation that sets out what most people would call their parental rights.

So those with parental responsibility are responsible for determining decisions in relation to a child's upbringing, where they live, who they spend time with, what school they go to, what medical treatment they have, etc.

All of those sorts of decisions that a lot of people, as I say, tend to think of as their parental rights, but the term we use is parental responsibility.

And I think there's quite a lot said about the use of the word responsibility there.

It tells you a lot about the court's mindset, which is, as a parent, it's not your right to do these things.

Fathers will have it if they're married or in a civil partnership with the mother.

There's various other ways and they're a little bit beyond the scope of today, but there's lots of different scenarios in which someone might have it.

But the key fundamental point is if you have two people with parental responsibility, and I think it would be easy for me to sort of just say the parents for the peripers of today, but it may not necessarily be the parents.

But if all the people with parental responsibility agree on what's best for a child, then that is simply what happens.

If they agree what school the child should go to, then that is where they go to school.

Earlier last week, I decided to put out on Facebook and LinkedIn a question saying that we're going to be interviewing today.

Was there any questions people might have on a legal basis when it comes to working as a DSL, predominantly in schools? And while these questions are tailored specifically to schools, they still apply directly to various other organizations as well.

But as DSLs, we often receive information about court orders relating to children.

Can you just briefly explain the types of orders that will be provided to schools?

So there's two sort of different areas in which the school might see court orders.

One is predominantly in relation to the children themselves, things like child arrangements orders, specific issue orders or prohibited steps orders.

But you also might have a school seeing some injunction orders such as non-molestation orders.

In order to really explain why these orders are in place, it's worth taking a step back and talking about something called parental responsibility.

It comes from a piece of legislation that sets out what most people would call their parental rights.

So those with parental responsibility are responsible for determining decisions in relation to a child's upbringing, where they live, who they spend time with, what school they go to, what medical treatment they have, etc.

All of those sorts of decisions that a lot of people, as I say, tend to think of as their parental rights, but the term we use is parental responsibility.

And I think there's quite a lot said about the use of the word responsibility there.

It tells you a lot about the court's mindset, which is, as a parent, it's not your right to do these things.

Fathers will have it if they're married or in a civil partnership with the mother.

There's various other ways and they're a little bit beyond the scope of today, but there's lots of different scenarios in which someone might have it.

But the key fundamental point is if you have two people with parental responsibility, and I think it would be easy for me to sort of just say the parents for the peripers of today, but it may not necessarily be the parents.

But if all the people with parental responsibility agree on what's best for a child, then that is simply what happens.

If they agree what school the child should go to, then that is where they go to school.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.