Psychologically Speaking with Leila Ainge
Aug 24, 2026 · 11 min · 8 segments
A glass gold gilded conker from Effie Burns collection is the inspiration for our final reflection room taster session. We are thinking…
Leila AingeHost
And it made me wonder, If we were like a conker in a shell, what would our prickles psychologically be for? What purpose do they serve? One explanation psychologically comes from social identity theory because it says that we don't defend our opinions, but we defend who we are.

I see myself as somebody who is thoughtful and kind and competent and knowledgeable and And if feedback suddenly threatens that identity, I wouldn't be thinking, oh, have I got something wrong? I'd be thinking, what does this mean? Am I still the same person that I thought I was? And that's a much bigger question, isn't it? And perhaps that's why moments of criticism leave us feeling so exposed.

And this is quite interesting and curious because it means that when people are reminded of the values and identities that matter most to them, we do become less defensive.

So if I think about that conker, the values is the golden conker inside Ephes and sculpture, her glass creation.

But if I'm aligned with that value in the middle and I remember that is who I am and I know that about myself and I remind myself of that frequently, then it just means that I don't have to be so protective over it because it just is, it exists.

And this shows how our brains respond to rejection and criticism and exclusion in ways that are very similar to pain pathways.

In other words, what it feels like to be being prickly may just be the nervous system trying to keep us safe.

And it's perhaps easy to forgive ourselves for being prickly when we're trying to protect the core of our identity and who we value or what we value about ourselves.

And it made me wonder, If we were like a conker in a shell, what would our prickles psychologically be for? What purpose do they serve? One explanation psychologically comes from social identity theory because it says that we don't defend our opinions, but we defend who we are.

I see myself as somebody who is thoughtful and kind and competent and knowledgeable and And if feedback suddenly threatens that identity, I wouldn't be thinking, oh, have I got something wrong? I'd be thinking, what does this mean? Am I still the same person that I thought I was? And that's a much bigger question, isn't it? And perhaps that's why moments of criticism leave us feeling so exposed.

And this is quite interesting and curious because it means that when people are reminded of the values and identities that matter most to them, we do become less defensive.

So if I think about that conker, the values is the golden conker inside Ephes and sculpture, her glass creation.

But if I'm aligned with that value in the middle and I remember that is who I am and I know that about myself and I remind myself of that frequently, then it just means that I don't have to be so protective over it because it just is, it exists.

And this shows how our brains respond to rejection and criticism and exclusion in ways that are very similar to pain pathways.

In other words, what it feels like to be being prickly may just be the nervous system trying to keep us safe.

And it's perhaps easy to forgive ourselves for being prickly when we're trying to protect the core of our identity and who we value or what we value about ourselves.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.