Listener sentiment
Recent listener sentiment is deeply polarized, marking a notable shift from the show's early years when reviews were near-universally enthusiastic. The through-line of praise remains consistent: listeners value Sir Richard Dearlove's unparalleled intelligence background, the high calibre of guests, and the calm, non-confrontational interviewing style that distinguishes the show from more combative geopolitical podcasts. However, the dominant story in recent ratings is a partisan divide that cuts both ways. A substantial camp accuses Dearlove of veering too far right — citing his pro-Brexit posture, perceived sympathy for Trump, controversial remarks about South African farmers, and questionable guest selections such as Trita Parsi — while an equally vocal contingent argues the opposite, faulting the co-hosts as too left-leaning and objecting to reliance on Democratic former officials for U.S. perspective. Recurring criticisms independent of politics include weak or rambling questioning in certain interviews, a desire for a British host, and frustration that guests are sometimes allowed to make unsubstantiated claims without challenge. The net result is a show whose core geopolitical expertise is still admired but whose perceived editorial balance is now actively contested from both sides of the aisle.
Apple3.3 · 46
Summary generated Aug 8, 2026
