Jun 30, 2026 · 9 min · 6 segments
More money and more staff are often seen as the solution to nonprofit burnout and overextension, but this episode challenges that assumption. On this episode of Nonprofit Mission: Impact, host Carol…
Carol HamiltonHost
So when I'm doing strategic planning, I often ask in my interviews and in focus groups, "If you had three wishes for your organization, and you could change anything that you want, what would you wish for?" And frequently, almost, I would say 90% of the people that I talk to say that they want more funding for more staff.

So why isn't that always the answer? I think it comes down to the assumption that more money and more staff is always going to mean less work, and when it often doesn't.

If the economy is not growing, even if it's just staying steady, folks fear a recession.

And certainly, growing your organization, having more resources to meet the demands, further your mission, address the needs that you're addressing, all of those are certainly good things.

What I'm saying is that people fall into a fallacy where they equate more staff and more funding as a way to get out of overwhelm, overwork, and overcommitment, with the idea that, "If we just had more staff, I would have people to delegate to, I would have less on my plate." But what I have found and what I have noticed in all my years of working in the nonprofit sector is that the reality is that nonprofit leaders are very ambitious.

Most vision statements, mission statements are way beyond what that organization can actually deliver.

When you grow, when you add that more staff, when you get more funding, it's often to take on new projects, new programs, new services.

So in the end, you're still overloaded and overworked, and running the organization actually becomes more complicated because you have more people and more things to keep track of.

So more funding, if we just had more money, everything would be fine, we could hire more people and achieve our goals, ends up, unfortunately, in the scenario above where it does not lighten the load at all.

Restricted funding doesn't contribute to your overhead costs, so you're expected to find a match for your funding.

And now you have more money to track, new reports to write, and new funders to please.

So when I'm doing strategic planning, I often ask in my interviews and in focus groups, "If you had three wishes for your organization, and you could change anything that you want, what would you wish for?" And frequently, almost, I would say 90% of the people that I talk to say that they want more funding for more staff.

So why isn't that always the answer? I think it comes down to the assumption that more money and more staff is always going to mean less work, and when it often doesn't.

If the economy is not growing, even if it's just staying steady, folks fear a recession.

And certainly, growing your organization, having more resources to meet the demands, further your mission, address the needs that you're addressing, all of those are certainly good things.

What I'm saying is that people fall into a fallacy where they equate more staff and more funding as a way to get out of overwhelm, overwork, and overcommitment, with the idea that, "If we just had more staff, I would have people to delegate to, I would have less on my plate." But what I have found and what I have noticed in all my years of working in the nonprofit sector is that the reality is that nonprofit leaders are very ambitious.

Most vision statements, mission statements are way beyond what that organization can actually deliver.

When you grow, when you add that more staff, when you get more funding, it's often to take on new projects, new programs, new services.

So in the end, you're still overloaded and overworked, and running the organization actually becomes more complicated because you have more people and more things to keep track of.

So more funding, if we just had more money, everything would be fine, we could hire more people and achieve our goals, ends up, unfortunately, in the scenario above where it does not lighten the load at all.

Restricted funding doesn't contribute to your overhead costs, so you're expected to find a match for your funding.

And now you have more money to track, new reports to write, and new funders to please.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.