Sep 1, 2026 · 13 min · 10 segments
Send us your feedback In this follow-on episode, Technology Partner…
Jess BremnerGuest
Tom MaaslandHost
Sure, social licence is all about meaningful engagement and transparency in order to bring New Zealanders on the digital infrastructure journey.

I think many people still don't fully understand what data centres do or the importance for how they go about their day-to-day life.

While there may be concerns about how data centres operate, the reality is that data centres already support digital services that we use every day, such as our online banking, healthcare systems, government systems, social media, cloud platforms, Uber, Netflix, ChatGPT, and all of the other ride-sharing, video streaming, and AI tools.

It was repeatedly discussed at the summit that communities not only need to understand what data centres are, but why they matter and how those data centres are being constructed and run.

This means being transparent about issues such as power consumption, water use, land use and infrastructure requirements.

It also means communicating the benefits, the jobs, the investment, the potential for new renewable energy generation, and the broader economic opportunities that can positively impact all New Zealanders.

But those benefits aren't automatic, and part of earning social licence is being able to clearly demonstrate how individual projects will be managed and deliver value back to communities and New Zealand as a whole.

Are the concerns around issues like power and water justified? I mean, if you look at the public discussion, people are asking legitimate questions about electricity demand, water use, and whether the long-term benefits really stack up.

Yes, I think these are absolutely legitimate questions, and that's why social licence has become such an important discussion.

There is a common perception, driven mostly by examples of rapid data centre development overseas, that data centres are intensive users of power and water.

While those concerns are understandable, the reality is more nuanced than that.

Modern data centres are becoming much more efficient, with significant advances in cooling technology and energy usage.

Also, we here in New Zealand start with some natural advantages, including a relatively cool climate, which can reduce the amount of energy and water needed to keep facilities clean.

A good example of this is Datacom's Rosedale data centre, where it was discussed at the summit that this uses less water than a four-person household.

So while use of our resources is absolutely part of the conversation, modern data centres can look very different to the large energy intensive facilities that the public hear about overseas.

One criticism we are seeing is that data centres don't actually create many permanent jobs once they're built.

Sure, social licence is all about meaningful engagement and transparency in order to bring New Zealanders on the digital infrastructure journey.

I think many people still don't fully understand what data centres do or the importance for how they go about their day-to-day life.

While there may be concerns about how data centres operate, the reality is that data centres already support digital services that we use every day, such as our online banking, healthcare systems, government systems, social media, cloud platforms, Uber, Netflix, ChatGPT, and all of the other ride-sharing, video streaming, and AI tools.

It was repeatedly discussed at the summit that communities not only need to understand what data centres are, but why they matter and how those data centres are being constructed and run.

This means being transparent about issues such as power consumption, water use, land use and infrastructure requirements.

It also means communicating the benefits, the jobs, the investment, the potential for new renewable energy generation, and the broader economic opportunities that can positively impact all New Zealanders.

But those benefits aren't automatic, and part of earning social licence is being able to clearly demonstrate how individual projects will be managed and deliver value back to communities and New Zealand as a whole.

Are the concerns around issues like power and water justified? I mean, if you look at the public discussion, people are asking legitimate questions about electricity demand, water use, and whether the long-term benefits really stack up.

Yes, I think these are absolutely legitimate questions, and that's why social licence has become such an important discussion.

There is a common perception, driven mostly by examples of rapid data centre development overseas, that data centres are intensive users of power and water.

While those concerns are understandable, the reality is more nuanced than that.

Modern data centres are becoming much more efficient, with significant advances in cooling technology and energy usage.

Also, we here in New Zealand start with some natural advantages, including a relatively cool climate, which can reduce the amount of energy and water needed to keep facilities clean.

A good example of this is Datacom's Rosedale data centre, where it was discussed at the summit that this uses less water than a four-person household.

So while use of our resources is absolutely part of the conversation, modern data centres can look very different to the large energy intensive facilities that the public hear about overseas.

One criticism we are seeing is that data centres don't actually create many permanent jobs once they're built.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.