Sep 22, 2026 · 2 hr 1 min · 57 segments
Former F-16 instructor Chris Lehto sits down with Anastasia Bendebury and Michael Shilo DeLay of DemystifySci to work through the 2004 USS Nimitz Tic Tac: how something could move like that with no…
Michael Shilo DeLayGuest
Anastasia BendeburyGuestChris LehtoHostIn the 2004 Nimitz Tic Tac incident, seasoned Navy radar operator Kevin Day reported objects initially in space and then saw them dropping from 28,000 feet down to sea level in less than a second, while pilots David Fravor and Alex Dietrich had a direct visual encounter.
And every answer I hear about this is it's either aliens or it's some camera glitch or camera glare.
And they just put out this book, Paradox Lost, The Material Principles of Natural Philosophy.
Is there a material answer for the five observables? Is there a material reason or even a possibility, a speculation of what the Tic Tac could be using to do the crazy things it does? I think a couple of their answers are going to bother some people.
There's no obvious propulsion system on the Tic Tac, right? It's not like it's got thrusters.
And so it kind of tells you that if it is flying around the way that it appears inside of all of these videos, it's doing something very, very different than the way that we build propulsion systems.
And the lack of sonic boom might actually have something to do with that.
When we talk about like anti-gravity propulsion or we talk about these like really exotic forms of engines, I think that there's a sense that it might be some kind of anti-gravity system, right? So if you're not subject to gravity, if you're not subject to inertia, then you're capable of performing the kinds of motions that are seen on this video where it goes from, you know, sea level to what, like 30,000 feet in altitude.
In the 2004 Nimitz Tic Tac incident, seasoned Navy radar operator Kevin Day reported objects initially in space and then saw them dropping from 28,000 feet down to sea level in less than a second, while pilots David Fravor and Alex Dietrich had a direct visual encounter.
And every answer I hear about this is it's either aliens or it's some camera glitch or camera glare.
And they just put out this book, Paradox Lost, The Material Principles of Natural Philosophy.
Is there a material answer for the five observables? Is there a material reason or even a possibility, a speculation of what the Tic Tac could be using to do the crazy things it does? I think a couple of their answers are going to bother some people.
There's no obvious propulsion system on the Tic Tac, right? It's not like it's got thrusters.
And so it kind of tells you that if it is flying around the way that it appears inside of all of these videos, it's doing something very, very different than the way that we build propulsion systems.
And the lack of sonic boom might actually have something to do with that.
When we talk about like anti-gravity propulsion or we talk about these like really exotic forms of engines, I think that there's a sense that it might be some kind of anti-gravity system, right? So if you're not subject to gravity, if you're not subject to inertia, then you're capable of performing the kinds of motions that are seen on this video where it goes from, you know, sea level to what, like 30,000 feet in altitude.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.
