John HewittHost
You mentioned that you've been a manager of both direct private equity investment and investing funds.

As I understand it, PPET is predominantly or is mainly focused on investing through other vehicles.
So all it would do would be primary investments, as we call them, into funds or primary commitments even.
So that's basically committing to a private equity fund on day one when the fund has no assets in the ground, what's not made any investments into portfolio companies.
So you're really making a judgment call on the manager itself, that they're differentiated, that they're best in class.
Primary investments or primary funds, as they're known, bring a lot of advantages insofar as they They provide consistent exposure by vintage years.
So in private equity, we talk about vintage years a lot and performance by vintage year can vary a lot.
Returns in that vintage year probably not going to be as good as the returns in, say, 2023, 2024, when valuations had come down a bit.
It's that diversification, consistent deployment, and the access to some of the best managers.
So that's when we buy a fund position from another investor part the way through the fund's life.
That would be like when you know the underlying portfolio companies, you can analyze them, you make more of a judgment call on the assets themselves as well as the manager.
But it's less of a leap of faith and a and the payback on your investments often quicker.
But importantly, over the last seven years, basically from the time that I became the manager of the trust, we've introduced direct investments to the investment objective.
I should say secondaries are 9% or 10%, and then primaries are around 60% to 63% of portfolio value today.
The advantage of directs is you can take more concentrated judgment calls, concentrated investments.

You mentioned that you've been a manager of both direct private equity investment and investing funds.

As I understand it, PPET is predominantly or is mainly focused on investing through other vehicles.
So all it would do would be primary investments, as we call them, into funds or primary commitments even.
So that's basically committing to a private equity fund on day one when the fund has no assets in the ground, what's not made any investments into portfolio companies.
So you're really making a judgment call on the manager itself, that they're differentiated, that they're best in class.
Primary investments or primary funds, as they're known, bring a lot of advantages insofar as they They provide consistent exposure by vintage years.
So in private equity, we talk about vintage years a lot and performance by vintage year can vary a lot.
Returns in that vintage year probably not going to be as good as the returns in, say, 2023, 2024, when valuations had come down a bit.
It's that diversification, consistent deployment, and the access to some of the best managers.
So that's when we buy a fund position from another investor part the way through the fund's life.
That would be like when you know the underlying portfolio companies, you can analyze them, you make more of a judgment call on the assets themselves as well as the manager.
But it's less of a leap of faith and a and the payback on your investments often quicker.
But importantly, over the last seven years, basically from the time that I became the manager of the trust, we've introduced direct investments to the investment objective.
I should say secondaries are 9% or 10%, and then primaries are around 60% to 63% of portfolio value today.
The advantage of directs is you can take more concentrated judgment calls, concentrated investments.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.