Lawrence BurnsHostClaire ShawHostAnd it's remarkable how ASML's expertise at printing the tiniest of details onto silicon makes so much change possible.
And I thought Christophe's suggestion that Moore's law had been put on steroids was one of the standouts.
So let's start with what convinced Scottish Mortgage to invest in ASML when it was unclear its EUV technology was going to be a success?

We didn't know that EUV technology was going to work and we had to accept that uncertainty when making the original case.

I remember we went through and we tried to talk to people in the semiconductor industry.

We tried to look up academic journals, but our ability to analyze that was pretty limited.

This was working out of one of the, at the time, greatest human technical endeavors would be successful or not.

And as fund managers, we have to be conscious of what our limitations are, and that was certainly one.


So we wanted to be invested and close to ASML in part to understand its progress because it had such profound implications for the world and for our portfolio.


And that was really the biggest players in the industry saying, this is the only way we're going to solve this bottleneck.

And we have to cooperate and we're going to fund them and we're going to give whatever it takes to ensure this is achieved.


If they were successful, there was going to be significant long term upside that would come from this.

But I think if you take a step back from that original investment, it's just that reminder that all of our truly great investments for shareholders have had an element of risk and they've had an element of uncertainty.
And it's remarkable how ASML's expertise at printing the tiniest of details onto silicon makes so much change possible.
And I thought Christophe's suggestion that Moore's law had been put on steroids was one of the standouts.
So let's start with what convinced Scottish Mortgage to invest in ASML when it was unclear its EUV technology was going to be a success?

We didn't know that EUV technology was going to work and we had to accept that uncertainty when making the original case.

I remember we went through and we tried to talk to people in the semiconductor industry.

We tried to look up academic journals, but our ability to analyze that was pretty limited.

This was working out of one of the, at the time, greatest human technical endeavors would be successful or not.

And as fund managers, we have to be conscious of what our limitations are, and that was certainly one.


So we wanted to be invested and close to ASML in part to understand its progress because it had such profound implications for the world and for our portfolio.


And that was really the biggest players in the industry saying, this is the only way we're going to solve this bottleneck.

And we have to cooperate and we're going to fund them and we're going to give whatever it takes to ensure this is achieved.


If they were successful, there was going to be significant long term upside that would come from this.

But I think if you take a step back from that original investment, it's just that reminder that all of our truly great investments for shareholders have had an element of risk and they've had an element of uncertainty.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.