Oct 8, 2026 · 20 min · 8 segments
The “fifth quarter” – including offal, cheeks, and trotters – is becoming an essential commercial and nutritional strategy for South Africa’s red meat industry. Supported by findings from the Red Meat…
So how does using more parts of the animal contribute to reducing waste and perhaps creating a more sustainable industry?
And that cost doesn't change whether we use 60% of the animal or whether we use 100% of the animal.
If the fifth quarter is about 20 to 35% of the animal's live weight, we're not using it properly.
We're wasting a significant portion of every environmental input that went into raising this animal for no nutritional return at all for this animal.
And we flip that around, and using more of the animal means we get more protein, we get more iron, we get more vitamins out of exactly the same input cost that we had into this animal, who can't just grow steaks from an animal.
The organ meats are obviously also part of the whole process to get the animal to a slaughter weight.
And that is about as direct a sustainability win as the industry has available to it, and it doesn't require a single additional animal to be raised.
So the input cost, you just get so much more bang for your buck using the entire animal.
When we tested how these organs cook, liver in particularly retained somewhere between 76 to 84% of its raw weight as usable edible product, and liver has no bone in it.
There's real value in doing this and consuming these parts, and this is also seen in different studies.
So how does using more parts of the animal contribute to reducing waste and perhaps creating a more sustainable industry?
And that cost doesn't change whether we use 60% of the animal or whether we use 100% of the animal.
If the fifth quarter is about 20 to 35% of the animal's live weight, we're not using it properly.
We're wasting a significant portion of every environmental input that went into raising this animal for no nutritional return at all for this animal.
And we flip that around, and using more of the animal means we get more protein, we get more iron, we get more vitamins out of exactly the same input cost that we had into this animal, who can't just grow steaks from an animal.
The organ meats are obviously also part of the whole process to get the animal to a slaughter weight.
And that is about as direct a sustainability win as the industry has available to it, and it doesn't require a single additional animal to be raised.
So the input cost, you just get so much more bang for your buck using the entire animal.
When we tested how these organs cook, liver in particularly retained somewhere between 76 to 84% of its raw weight as usable edible product, and liver has no bone in it.
There's real value in doing this and consuming these parts, and this is also seen in different studies.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.