Judge Rules Search Warrants Used Against Prince Andrew Were Unlawful

So yesterday over in the UK, the High Court in London decided that the search warrants that were issued for Prince Andrew initially were issued improperly.

So that means all of the evidence that was seized from Prince Andrew is null and void.

Now this comes after a ruling that was made by the High Court in London and both sides, Prince Andrew and the Thames Valley Police agreed to get rid of the warrant before this hearing even began.

Now of course the cynic in me says, is this all part of the plan? Did they issue these warrants on purpose the way they did so that later on down the road Prince Andrew could go to the High Court in London and get the help he needs to quash them? Again, that's the cynic in me.

Does that mean that that's what happened? Of course not.

And more than likely what happened here is that the police jumped the gun.

But unfortunately when we're talking about this topic and we're talking about Jeffrey Epstein and all of his friends, we really can't rule anything out of the realm of possibility.

We've seen it all.

So would it really be that shocking to see that the UK isn't on the cover-up? Wouldn't be that shocking to me.

So before we dive down that rabbit hole, why don't we dive into this article from the New York Post and see what's what.

Headline, Judge says search warrants used to seize property from former Prince Andrew were unlawful.

This article was authored by the Associated Press.

Police who searched the properties of the former Prince Andrew and seized his property in the investigation into his links to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have agreed the search warrants were unlawful, a London judge said on Thursday.

Yo, how does something like that even happen? You didn't do your due diligence before raiding this dude's house? You didn't have every lawyer in the whole place take a look at what's going on and make sure that everything's valid? That everything's going to stand up in court? I mean, that's what a real investigation would have done, right? A serious investigation.

You have to make sure that everything's going to withstand the onslaught of challenges that are certainly going to come from a guy like Andrew.

So if you don't have all your ducks in a row, you're asking for big trouble.

Justice Nicholas Hillard said that the Thames Valley Police had made a significant error in applying for the warrants when they searched the properties of the former Prince, now known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

So what were the errors? What were the mistakes? And look, I understand that the UK has a different legal system than the United States, but how come we don't know what was improper? Are we going to get that information at some point? Mountbatten Windsor was arrested on February 19th on suspicion of misconduct in public office and police searched two of his homes.

His lawyers asked the High Court to invalidate the warrants under which those searches were conducted.

Hilliard said the parties had agreed to invalidate the warrants before the hearing on Thursday.

Thames Valley Police said it had accepted the fact that the warrants must be quashed because the initial court's decision to issue them was incorrect.

Talk about a shit show.

You guys can't even conduct a basic investigation when you have all this evidence right there in front of you.

You can't get a real warrant.

You have to do whatever it is you did and now set everything back.