"SARA DUTERTE": ONLY 14 VOTES FOR CONVICTION!??

Sinabi ng basically ng Ombudsman is tinrabaho yung, yung nangyari kay Bong Revilla and, and that created a stir kasi others took offense.

Parang how dare you cast aspersion on integrity of our justice system.

Yung iba parang, "Aba, aba, sila pa ang biktima ngayon? Eh, napaka-questionable yung nangyari sa granting of bail." Now, this is also important because idikit natin mamaya, baka potentially three senators na aligned sa mga Dutertes could face non-- or two are already facing non-bailable plunder charges which could have an implication for pano mo i-count two-thirds, 'di ba? Pero doon muna tayo sa is it unusual for the Ombudsman to openly question the other side of the equation, the Sandiganbayan's decision? Um, um, and, and how do you understand the decision on the Bong Revilla? Kasi i-it was a two to three na medyo it's not like [laughs] it was not a straightforward, 'di ba?

It was not a unanimous decision, yeah.

Yes.

So that pa lang medyo what's going on? I think the Ombudsman even used the term dapat wake-up call 'yun.

Is he suggesting na something is really broken with Sandiganbayan? I don't know.

Kaka ano lang, kaka-survive ko lang sa contempt case.

Eh, pwede ba rin ba ako ma-contempt sa Sandiganbayan? Meron bang ganun, indirect contempt? [laughs]

Every statement-

Hirap pala toh matanong.

[laughs] Wala akong sinasabi.

I'm just saying, you know, parang-

Oo.

This is the Ombudsman.

Mm-hmm.

Well, um, non-bailable kasi yung offense so kinailangan mag-file ng motion for bail ni-

Yeah

... uh, ni Senator Bong Revilla.

At kung sa non-bailable offense, kailangan para makapag-avail ka ng bail, um, makapag-pyansa ka, dapat mapatunayan mo that the evidence of guilt is not strong, meaning mahina yung ebidensya laban sa'yo-

Yeah

... for you to be entitled to bail.

So, um, that's the reason why medyo kakabahan ka na ngayon.

Medyo kakabahan na ang, uh, prosecution ngayon-

Yeah