Athletes tell me that they don't feel sharp without the faster stuff, that cutting intervals and threshold work makes them feel really slow.
Now, some keep doing 5K or threshold-type sessions year-round, even into the taper, because it's the only way they know how to feel ready.
And they fear getting dropped by training partners or how the Strava file looks.
But here's the problem with that, because fitness for a 5K and fitness for a 100-miler are not the same thing.
And wanting to feel fast like a 5K runner while trying to perform like a 100-mile runner is chasing two different definitions of fitness at once.
Now, athletes who hold on to speed work year-round to keep feeling sharp are optimizing for a sensation of confidence, not a specific result.
Even athletes who understand all of this are afraid that if they actually commit to the volume, that they might overtrain, that all of those miles will break them down instead of build them up.
So they reach for something that feels like a safer bet, maybe a strength circuit that promises the same benefit with less risk or hard interval sessions that feels more productive.
But both of these fears, wanting to feel fast and worrying that volume will completely wreck you, come from the same root mistake: confusing how fit you feel in the moment with how fit you actually are for the distance in front of you.
Now, those are not the same thing, and confusing them is what actually gets people hurt or burned out.
Maximizing volume means just piling up miles without any regard for recovery, intensity control, or your individual capacity.
But optimizing volume means building the largest dose of low-intensity aerobic work that your body can absorb and adapt to, structured correctly and recovered from properly for the distance that you're training for.
Athletes tell me that they don't feel sharp without the faster stuff, that cutting intervals and threshold work makes them feel really slow.
Now, some keep doing 5K or threshold-type sessions year-round, even into the taper, because it's the only way they know how to feel ready.
And they fear getting dropped by training partners or how the Strava file looks.
But here's the problem with that, because fitness for a 5K and fitness for a 100-miler are not the same thing.
And wanting to feel fast like a 5K runner while trying to perform like a 100-mile runner is chasing two different definitions of fitness at once.
Now, athletes who hold on to speed work year-round to keep feeling sharp are optimizing for a sensation of confidence, not a specific result.
Even athletes who understand all of this are afraid that if they actually commit to the volume, that they might overtrain, that all of those miles will break them down instead of build them up.
So they reach for something that feels like a safer bet, maybe a strength circuit that promises the same benefit with less risk or hard interval sessions that feels more productive.
But both of these fears, wanting to feel fast and worrying that volume will completely wreck you, come from the same root mistake: confusing how fit you feel in the moment with how fit you actually are for the distance in front of you.
Now, those are not the same thing, and confusing them is what actually gets people hurt or burned out.
Maximizing volume means just piling up miles without any regard for recovery, intensity control, or your individual capacity.
But optimizing volume means building the largest dose of low-intensity aerobic work that your body can absorb and adapt to, structured correctly and recovered from properly for the distance that you're training for.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.