Aug 24, 2026 · 40 min · 8 segments
In this episode, Simon Goode explores common challenges faced by team leaders in managing workplace conflict through three detailed case studies. He analyzes each situation using practical conflict…
So the first situation involves Alex and we've got a case study of resistance to the new team leader.
When Alex was promoted to team leader of the customer support unit, several long serving staff members struggled to accept the change.
They had worked under the previous manager for years and preferred the old informal style.
Within days, two experienced agents began openly questioning the new rules in team meetings, rolling their eyes when Alex spoke, and continuing to follow the old informal methods.
Other team members noticed the quiet defiance and became unsure whose directions to follow.
The atmosphere grew tense with conversations stopping when Alex entered the room and small tasks being completed more slowly than before.
Oh gosh, it sounds so challenging, doesn't it? Even reading this with the relatively high level summary that we're looking at, my heart goes out to poor Alex.
It's the kind of situation where it's difficult even to know what's going on, let alone what you should consider doing in terms of responding.
I suppose this is the kind of situation where you do want to tread a little bit carefully.
One of the things that Alex might regret is throwing around ultimatums or throwing around threats, especially when he doesn't necessarily have the authority to back that up.
In my experience, that really does undermine your own authority when you say this is your last chance and then nothing changes.
And then what do you know? The person doesn't get the consequence that you had threatened them with.
So what is the conflict about? I might just underline that phrase, the old informal style.
And then a lot of the structures around the targets and around the handover process.
Now, as a mediator, when I hear phrases like it's their leadership style or their leadership approach, what I often hear is that we're dealing with a difference in values.
Someone feels like the boss is looking over their shoulder, the team leader won't let them go.
And the team leader is thinking, look, it's my job to be across what's going on here.
So the first situation involves Alex and we've got a case study of resistance to the new team leader.
When Alex was promoted to team leader of the customer support unit, several long serving staff members struggled to accept the change.
They had worked under the previous manager for years and preferred the old informal style.
Within days, two experienced agents began openly questioning the new rules in team meetings, rolling their eyes when Alex spoke, and continuing to follow the old informal methods.
Other team members noticed the quiet defiance and became unsure whose directions to follow.
The atmosphere grew tense with conversations stopping when Alex entered the room and small tasks being completed more slowly than before.
Oh gosh, it sounds so challenging, doesn't it? Even reading this with the relatively high level summary that we're looking at, my heart goes out to poor Alex.
It's the kind of situation where it's difficult even to know what's going on, let alone what you should consider doing in terms of responding.
I suppose this is the kind of situation where you do want to tread a little bit carefully.
One of the things that Alex might regret is throwing around ultimatums or throwing around threats, especially when he doesn't necessarily have the authority to back that up.
In my experience, that really does undermine your own authority when you say this is your last chance and then nothing changes.
And then what do you know? The person doesn't get the consequence that you had threatened them with.
So what is the conflict about? I might just underline that phrase, the old informal style.
And then a lot of the structures around the targets and around the handover process.
Now, as a mediator, when I hear phrases like it's their leadership style or their leadership approach, what I often hear is that we're dealing with a difference in values.
Someone feels like the boss is looking over their shoulder, the team leader won't let them go.
And the team leader is thinking, look, it's my job to be across what's going on here.
Every episode on Radar is fully transcribed, speaker-labeled, and rich with metadata. Here is a taste of this one. Try Radar for free to see the rest.
3 of 9
Why Public Conflict Escalates
Public arguments escalate when people fear humiliation.
Authority Without Railroaded Expertise
Leaders can include expertise without surrendering authority.
When Leadership Becomes A Values Conflict
Workplace disagreements often hide competing values underneath.
+6 more clips · 9 min 31 sec of audio in all
7 of 13
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
All 9 clips — the highlight moments, each cut as its own audio, with a title and a speaker
All 8 segments — the transcript broken into labeled sections, every ad read marked
All 13 topics — jump to every other episode discussing the same subject
Every related episode — other shows Radar links to this one
No account is needed to search Radar.
