Listener sentiment
Clues continues to earn strong enthusiasm from a loyal listener base — many of whom discovered the show through Morgan Absher's Two Hot Takes or Kaelyn Moore's Heart Starts Pounding — who praise the hosts' natural rapport, conversational storytelling, and a victim-centered approach that stands out in a crowded true crime landscape. The most persistent structural criticism, echoed across many reviews independently, is that the podcast leans too heavily on widely covered, high-profile cases; several reviewers acknowledge a gradual shift toward more obscure stories in recent months, but the balance remains a frustration for seasoned true crime listeners. Morgan Absher's on-mic presence is the show's defining flashpoint: fans find her relatable and energetic, while detractors cite her uptalk, filler words, casual cursing (and inconsistent bleeping), and a tone they feel doesn't match the gravity of the subject matter — with some questioning whether she brings sufficient true-crime expertise to the format. Recurring friction also centers on the hosts inserting personal political commentary into episodes, a practice that has prompted repeated listener pushback, and on allegations that the show deletes critical comments rather than engaging with them, which has alienated some former followers. Rounding out the complaints are lengthy ad breaks, occasional factual errors, and the "botch board" segment, which some listeners love for tracking investigative missteps and others feel crowds out substantive analysis. None of these criticisms have meaningfully eroded the show's core following, but the divide over Morgan's style and the show's editorial choices remains the dominant story in the reviews.
Apple4.1 · 342
Summary generated Aug 23, 2026
