Esther StanhopeGuest
Marion BrownHost
Danielle Wilson-BrownHost
So emotional justice is a framework that names a legacy of untreated trauma that shapes how we see ourselves and each other, how we lead, how we learn, how we labor, how we love, as a result of the systems of harm that shape our modern world.

So that's colonialism, apartheid, enslavement, and the legacies that linger and show up in all the different systems that we navigate in our everyday world and life.

And that is we are taught that once you're educated, you have a sophistication, you have an eloquence.

So this idea that you can educate yourself out of these traumas that linger because of the systems of harm that are literally stitched into the fabric of everyday life is simply untrue.

So if you can't PhD your way out of them, so if you can't, it's not about acquiring more and more and more and more education.

And what I mean by that is how did emotion become a tool to sustain false notions of superiority when it comes to whiteness and inferiority when it came to being indigenous, being brown, being black, being of color? And how does emotion still show up to perpetrate those false notions? And what we had when it came to the world of emotions and healing was this phenomenal model in South Africa, the Truth of Reconciliation Commission, and these lions of justice, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela, and their narrative about the importance of forgiveness.

But what I learned when I went to Cape Town and I had the opportunity to interview Desmond Tutu, listen to freedom fighters like Adelaide Tambo and Nchiki Biko, the widow of Steve Biko, the father of black consciousness, is that what South Africa did was essentially center whiteness as a model for shaping forgiveness within a racial frame.

So what does that mean? In emotional justice, we call it emotional patriarchy.

So what that means is that society learned to center the feelings of white men centrally, but all men, no matter the cost or the consequence to the health, to the life, to the future of all people of color, and women.

What's the problem with that? The problem with that is that model then becomes the global model.

Everybody says the way we do healing, the way we do this work that's racial justice and healing is this model.

And so if it's not about humanity, what is the model that is? And that's how I began to build Emotional Justice.

So emotional justice is a framework that names a legacy of untreated trauma that shapes how we see ourselves and each other, how we lead, how we learn, how we labor, how we love, as a result of the systems of harm that shape our modern world.

So that's colonialism, apartheid, enslavement, and the legacies that linger and show up in all the different systems that we navigate in our everyday world and life.

And that is we are taught that once you're educated, you have a sophistication, you have an eloquence.

So this idea that you can educate yourself out of these traumas that linger because of the systems of harm that are literally stitched into the fabric of everyday life is simply untrue.

So if you can't PhD your way out of them, so if you can't, it's not about acquiring more and more and more and more education.

And what I mean by that is how did emotion become a tool to sustain false notions of superiority when it comes to whiteness and inferiority when it came to being indigenous, being brown, being black, being of color? And how does emotion still show up to perpetrate those false notions? And what we had when it came to the world of emotions and healing was this phenomenal model in South Africa, the Truth of Reconciliation Commission, and these lions of justice, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela, and their narrative about the importance of forgiveness.

But what I learned when I went to Cape Town and I had the opportunity to interview Desmond Tutu, listen to freedom fighters like Adelaide Tambo and Nchiki Biko, the widow of Steve Biko, the father of black consciousness, is that what South Africa did was essentially center whiteness as a model for shaping forgiveness within a racial frame.

So what does that mean? In emotional justice, we call it emotional patriarchy.

So what that means is that society learned to center the feelings of white men centrally, but all men, no matter the cost or the consequence to the health, to the life, to the future of all people of color, and women.

What's the problem with that? The problem with that is that model then becomes the global model.

Everybody says the way we do healing, the way we do this work that's racial justice and healing is this model.

And so if it's not about humanity, what is the model that is? And that's how I began to build Emotional Justice.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.