Jun 27, 2026 · 7 min · 9 segments
This episode dives into a Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report that uses big data from foot traffic to uncover hidden demand shocks affecting businesses in New York City. We explore how…
This paper discusses estimating demand shocks.
Yes, specifically in customer-facing businesses.
Like retail, service, and health sectors.
They say it's hard to measure demand shocks there.
Why is that?
Because output only occurs when a customer actually arrives at the establishment.
I see.
Unlike manufacturing, where output can be tracked more directly.
Precisely.
So they introduce a new way.
Using high-frequency foot traffic data from SafeGraph?
That's right.
But foot traffic isn't the same as demand, is it? It could be influenced by a store's own strategies.
That's a good point.
They recognize that.
So how do they account for it?
They present a theoretical framework.
It isolates establishment-level demand fluctuations.
And separates those from firm-level strategic choices?
Exactly.
That's a core part of their approach.
What did they find after doing all this?
Significant heterogeneity in the persistence of these demand shocks.
And in their trends?
Yes.
They also found that simply pooling all establishments together understates the variance experienced by some.
So treating all businesses the same would be misleading?
That's the core message here.
Read the full transcript.
Create an account to read the whole episode, search across every transcript, and follow the shows you care about.
This paper discusses estimating demand shocks.
Yes, specifically in customer-facing businesses.
Like retail, service, and health sectors.
They say it's hard to measure demand shocks there.
Why is that?
Because output only occurs when a customer actually arrives at the establishment.
I see.
Unlike manufacturing, where output can be tracked more directly.
Precisely.
So they introduce a new way.
Using high-frequency foot traffic data from SafeGraph?
That's right.
But foot traffic isn't the same as demand, is it? It could be influenced by a store's own strategies.
That's a good point.
They recognize that.
So how do they account for it?
They present a theoretical framework.
It isolates establishment-level demand fluctuations.
And separates those from firm-level strategic choices?
Exactly.
That's a core part of their approach.
What did they find after doing all this?
Significant heterogeneity in the persistence of these demand shocks.
And in their trends?
Yes.
They also found that simply pooling all establishments together understates the variance experienced by some.
So treating all businesses the same would be misleading?
That's the core message here.