David WolkGuest
Jason KarlawishHost
Chris BrownGuest
Terrence CaseyHost
Yeah, although the area where the convention is has slightly built up from where it was in 2017.

But yeah, I think probably the most concrete changes are just the size of the meeting itself.

And there were also 8,000 or approximately 8,000 abstracts that were submitted to the meeting.

And actually, another thing that I don't know if it was the case before, although I suspect it wasn't, there actually is a more non-US presence to the meeting where the majority is actually not from the US.

There's still obviously a very large US contingent, but it just shows how the global reach of the conference has expanded.

But while Chris listens to these two old men speak, let me just develop this.

And I don't mean that meanly, but I mean, there was a lot going on in the biomarker space but it was all deep in the wings, meaning none of it was ready for clinical primetime diagnostics.

And you saw that reflected in the industry space where there were very few booths vending things that were available for clinical practice.

And of course, therapeutics, I think, I don't know if that was yet another meeting where a negative trial was announced or it was in between yet another negative trial, but the same sentiment for therapeutics.

I mean, you know, I think 2017, we were probably very excited about Taopet at that point.

And so there were some advances in biomarkers, but the therapeutic landscape has obviously changed dramatically and just the richness of...

And for sure, the comment about the amount of work that's being done actually that is translating to the patients that we see is dramatically different now than it was in 2017.

Yeah, although the area where the convention is has slightly built up from where it was in 2017.

But yeah, I think probably the most concrete changes are just the size of the meeting itself.

And there were also 8,000 or approximately 8,000 abstracts that were submitted to the meeting.

And actually, another thing that I don't know if it was the case before, although I suspect it wasn't, there actually is a more non-US presence to the meeting where the majority is actually not from the US.

There's still obviously a very large US contingent, but it just shows how the global reach of the conference has expanded.

But while Chris listens to these two old men speak, let me just develop this.

And I don't mean that meanly, but I mean, there was a lot going on in the biomarker space but it was all deep in the wings, meaning none of it was ready for clinical primetime diagnostics.

And you saw that reflected in the industry space where there were very few booths vending things that were available for clinical practice.

And of course, therapeutics, I think, I don't know if that was yet another meeting where a negative trial was announced or it was in between yet another negative trial, but the same sentiment for therapeutics.

I mean, you know, I think 2017, we were probably very excited about Taopet at that point.

And so there were some advances in biomarkers, but the therapeutic landscape has obviously changed dramatically and just the richness of...

And for sure, the comment about the amount of work that's being done actually that is translating to the patients that we see is dramatically different now than it was in 2017.
The rest of this transcript — segmented and speaker-labeled, so you land on the exact moment something was said
Search every transcript — by keyword, by phrase, or by meaning, across every show Radar indexes
Trends — what is surging across podcasts, measured against its own baseline
Alerts — when a name you follow appears in a newly indexed episode
No account is needed to search Radar.