Skip to main content
William Nordhaus

William Nordhaus

American economistWikipedia

Search complete. 17 mentions across 12 episodes found for "William Nordhaus".

Nov 4, 2026

Jacob GoldsteinHOST
0:36
It is at least theoretically possible for everybody to be better off.
Jacob GoldsteinHOST
0:41
The economist whose work is at the center of the show is a guy named Bill Nordhaus.
Jacob GoldsteinHOST
0:46
And a few years after we talked to him for this episode, he actually won the Econ Nobel for his work on the economics of climate change.
Jacob GoldsteinHOST
0:53
Last week, Bill Nordhaus died at the age of 85.
Jacob GoldsteinHOST
0:57
And so today we are rerunning this episode in his memory.
Jacob GoldsteinHOST
1:01
I hope you like it.

7 MINS LATER

David KestenbaumHOST
7:47
Which isn't going to be invented for 100 years.
David KestenbaumHOST
7:50
From an economic perspective, if you want to try to quantify how much of a pain in the butt it is to make something, or at least how hard it is to get that thing, you can ask a simple question.
Larry ElderHOST
4:24
I was reading this statement by a Yale economist who won a Nobel Prize.
Larry ElderHOST
4:29
His name is William Nordhaus.
Larry ElderHOST
4:33
You know how the rich are getting richer and a bunch of robber barons, as Robert Rice, the Bill Clinton former labor secretary, put it, referring to Elon Musk.
Larry ElderHOST
4:43
He says that innovators, people like Elon Musk, capture on average 2.2% of the total surplus they create between 1948 and 2001.
Larry ElderHOST
4:24
I was reading this statement by a Yale economist who won a Nobel Prize.
Larry ElderHOST
4:29
His name is William Nordhaus.
Larry ElderHOST
4:33
You know how the rich are getting richer and a bunch of robber barons, as Robert Rice, the Bill Clinton former labor secretary, put it, referring to Elon Musk.
Larry ElderHOST
4:43
He says that innovators, people like Elon Musk, capture on average 2.2% of the total surplus they create between 1948 and 2001.
Nicholas SternGUEST
42:57
Let me, uh, illustrate that.
Nicholas SternGUEST
42:59
And let me do, uh, um, Bill Nordhaus is a friend, and he's a scholar and a gentleman.
Nicholas SternGUEST
43:04
He just happened to have been wrong on, on-
speaker_9UNKNOWN
43:06
[laughs]
Nick SternGUEST
42:59
And let me do, uh, um...
Nick SternGUEST
43:01
Bill Nordhaus is a friend, and he's a scholar and a gentleman.
Nick SternGUEST
43:04
He just happened to have been wrong on, on-
speaker_9UNKNOWN
43:06
[laughs]
Matt RyanGUEST
0:26
Plenty of people treat capitalism as synonymous with markets, which helps us understand what is possible to change.
Matt RyanGUEST
0:33
I don't know if we're swearing on this podcast, but fuck William Nordhaus.
Max Chandler-MatherHOST
0:44
Welcome to the Praxis podcast, a podcast on understanding the economy and how it dominates our lives.
Max Chandler-MatherHOST
0:50
Before we kick off, I'd like to acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which we're recording, the Yagura and Turrbal people, their elders past, present and emerging, and acknowledge that sovereignty was never ceded.

29 MINS LATER

Matt RyanGUEST
30:28
What Yeah, I don't know if we're swearing on this podcast, but Jesus.
Max Chandler-MatherHOST
30:32
Yeah, you can definitely swear on the Green Institute podcast.
Matt RyanGUEST
30:36
All right, well, fuck William Nordhaus.
Max Chandler-MatherHOST
30:38
Yeah, that's three and a half degrees of warming.
Steve KeenGUEST
22:52
Most of the countries have accepted what economists have done in terms of trivialising the dangers.
Steve KeenGUEST
22:57
So to put a bit of a number on that, William Nordhaus is the most prominent economist who talks about climate change, claimed that four and a half degrees of global warming by 2100 would reduce the GDP in 2100 by 7%.
Steve KeenGUEST
23:14
So rather than GDP being 100, let's say, it'd be 93 if we get to four and a half degrees of warming.
Steve KeenGUEST
23:21
Now, climate scientists say four and a half degrees of warming is an extinction event.

36 MINS LATER

Steve KeenGUEST
58:58
Oh, absolutely.
Steve KeenGUEST
58:59
I mean, it isn't a case that like the economists have been supported by the fossil fuel industry because what the economists are saying is basically saying, continue burning that oil, don't worry.
Steve KeenGUEST
59:10
And so people like William Nordhaus will get funding from fossil fuel interests in a way that I would never get that funding.
Steve KeenGUEST
59:18
But they're not saying it because they're being paid.
Alyssa BattistoniGUEST
8:38
And that's sort of a problem identified in the early 20th century.
Alyssa BattistoniGUEST
8:41
But by then, you know, early 21st century, you have people like Nicholas Stern, like William Nordhaus, who's the other sort of major climate economist, who won the so-called fake Nobel in economics a few years ago, for also doing a kind of climate economics focus around this question of missing prices.
Alyssa BattistoniGUEST
8:57
And they just say, well, this is why climate change is happening.
Alyssa BattistoniGUEST
8:59
We have not been paying for carbon emissions.
Alyssa BattistoniGUEST
8:38
And that's sort of a problem identified in the early 20th century.
Alyssa BattistoniGUEST
8:41
But by then, you know, early 21st century, you have people like Nicholas Stern, like William Nordhaus, who's the other sort of major climate economist, who won the so-called fake Nobel in economics a few years ago, for also doing a kind of climate economics focus around this question of missing prices.
Alyssa BattistoniGUEST
8:57
And they just say, well, this is why climate change is happening.
Alyssa BattistoniGUEST
8:59
We have not been paying for carbon emissions.
Jim PowerHOST
33:38
This guy goes on to say, and this is where he would be a total variance with your view of the world, much more sympathetic to my view of the world, that, you know, the focus on individual fortunes overlooks the vast economic value that many billionaires actually create.
Jim PowerHOST
33:55
And he quotes a Nobel laureate in economics, William Nordhaus, who who says that his research shows that innovators capture just 2.2% of the value they provide to society.
Jim PowerHOST
34:09
And he goes on to talk about Amazon, Apple, Google, who basically started life in garages.
Jim PowerHOST
34:16
So he goes on to say that rather than demonizing and attacking these people who created successful enterprises from nothing, that it's much better to tackle the privileges, the loopholes and the abuses that allow wealth to be unfairly acquired rather than undermine ventures that create it.

2 more episodes mention William Nordhaus.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.