Voluntary slavery

So what that means is he simply arbitrarily decrees that the previous consent is more relevant than the current consent, which means that he's just assuming you can't change your mind, but he uses that assumption to justify the fact that you can't change your mind, so it's circular reasoning.

That's ultimately the problem with Walter's, um, argument vol- for voluntary slavery, I believe.

Mm-hmm.

So, uh, and related to this, I have one question.