Skip to main content
Violence Against Women Act

Violence Against Women Act

Search complete. 52 mentions across 27 episodes found for "Violence Against Women Act".

Sep 24, 2026

Grace OvbaHOST
55:56
Attorney Barraza, who is leading one at least two group lawsuits against Lozano, says his lawsuit alleges she set up an industrial-scale operation, creating fake stories of domestic abuse and human trafficking to apply for humanitarian visas that her clients allegedly didn't qualify for or know were being filed on their behalf.
Grace OvbaHOST
56:20
You don't have to leave the country, so the T Visa and Violence Against Women Act, VAV, VAWA petition are very popular for people to avoid having to leave, and she focused on those so she could charge more money, Barraza said.
Grace OvbaHOST
56:37
Angelina said she had no idea Lozano's office had filed a domestic violence petition for her husband.
Grace OvbaHOST
56:43
She said that the attorney didn't say they were going to file it under that, and they just had her sign, Diana Gracia said.
speaker_5HOST
25:43
Exactly.
speaker_5HOST
25:44
And similarly, in the Morrison case, Congress passed the Violence Against Women Act, providing a federal civil remedy for victims of gender-motivated violence.
speaker_4HOST
25:53
Which is obviously a horrible problem.
speaker_5HOST
25:54
Yes, and the government presented mountains of data showing how gender-based violence costs the national economy billions in healthcare and lost productivity, but the Court again struck it down.
speaker_2HOST
53:37
The court doubled down on this non-economic limit five years later in US v. Morrison.
speaker_2HOST
53:42
Congress had passed the Violence Against Women Act, which provided a federal civil remedy for victims of gender-motivated violence.
speaker_2HOST
53:49
Congress had actually learned from Lopez and compiled a massive legislative record mountains of data proving that gender-motivated violence costs the national economy billions of dollars annually.
speaker_3HOST
54:00
But the court struck it down anyway.
Chris BrennanHOST
55:58
Moving forward, jumping eight years forward to 1994, there were a couple of sort of parallel things that happened under this Venus retrograde in Scorpio that were tough but important.
Chris BrennanHOST
56:08
One of them was the landmark Violence Against Women Act was signed into law at this time, and one of the primary senators who was, like, promoting it at this time was, uh, a younger Joe Biden, who had not just a, a stellium in the sign of Scorpio but also was born with Venus in Scorpio.
Chris BrennanHOST
56:32
And this event kind of dovetailed with another one that was taking place in the media at the same time, which is that, uh, during the course of that Venus retrograde, jury, the jury selection process began for the OJ Simpson trial.
Chris BrennanHOST
56:48
And, um, there was a lot of national discussions that were taking place about, like, domestic violence and, and abuse and different things like that that were sort of, like, really dominating the media headlines during the course of this Venus retrograde in Scorpio.
Chris BrennanHOST
57:05
And OJ Simpson later was famously, like, acquitted but then, um, found guilty in a civil trial, I believe, for murdering his wife, um, Nicole Simpson or Nicole Brown Simpson.
Chris BrennanHOST
57:20
So that was a tough one, but it gives you an idea of some of the themes that can sometimes come up during some of these Venus retrogrades, and sometimes there's difficult things, but then al- also sometimes there's progress, like the passage of this, um, Violence Against Women Act, which was pretty landmark at the time.
Chris BrennanHOST
57:38
Of course, there's other parallel things 'cause also issues of, like, like racism with, with the police came up during the course of the OJ Simpson trial.
Chris BrennanHOST
57:47
And that's another t- topic in terms of, um, raci- racism and issues surrounding it coming up sometimes during Venus retrograde in Scorpio that I'll talk about, I think, in, in one of the next sections.
speaker_1HOST
32:02
Exactly.
speaker_1HOST
32:03
And they applied the exact same structural logic five years later in United States v. Morrison, striking down the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act.
speaker_2HOST
32:14
Because again, Congress cannot regulate non-economic violent criminal conduct like gender-motivated violence based solely on its aggregate downstream economic consequences.
speaker_1HOST
32:24
Right.
Liz OrtenburgerGUEST
8:20
The other thing that happened in the 90s was the in the United States was the omnibus crime bill.
Liz OrtenburgerGUEST
8:26
which provided a significant level of funding in the Violence Against Women's Act for the criminal legal system to provide services, incarcerate, and do other things related to domestic violence.
Liz OrtenburgerGUEST
8:41
Very valid question to ask is, and so what? We haven't seen a decrease in domestic violence as it sits in per capita rates.
Liz OrtenburgerGUEST
8:52
We haven't seen a decrease in homicides, but we have spent billions and billions and billions of dollars to do this work, and yet we have really had no social gain, no metric I can point to that says, yes, those funds were spent in a way that we've seen an absolute reduction.
Amanda DoyleHOST
25:39
The whole domestic violence thing is, too.
Amanda DoyleHOST
25:40
The reason that the civil rights remedy of the Violence Against Women Act was overturned is because the federal court could not conceive of a world-
Ai-jen PooGUEST
25:49
That's right
Amanda DoyleHOST
25:49
...
speaker_3HOST
35:00
Therefore, the Wickard aggregation principle does not apply, and the causal chain linking the gun to the national economy is simply too attenuated to justify federal regulation.
speaker_2HOST
35:10
The Court reaffirmed this limitation a few years later in United States v. Morrison, striking down the civil remedy provision of the Violence Against Women Act.
speaker_2HOST
35:17
Gender-motivated violence, while a horrific national tragedy, is fundamentally non-economic violent criminal conduct, not interstate commerce.
speaker_3HOST
35:26
So how do you determine if a statute survives on an exam? You look for specific textual clues.
Patricia TimermanGUEST
45:21
So I used, when I was doing my master's in mental health, I was also working at an immigration law firm.
Patricia TimermanGUEST
45:28
So it made me very privy to Violence Against Women Act, U visas, asylum, trafficking visas.
Patricia TimermanGUEST
45:35
And because of my background in mental health, I kind of bridged the gap.
Patricia TimermanGUEST
45:39
Right.
Alla PolyastroHOST
1:19
Before joining the organization, she spent over four years at the Galveston Houston Immigrant Representation Project, where she represented detained immigrant clients in removal proceedings and litigated before federal districts and appellate courts, including the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Alla PolyastroHOST
1:37
Throughout her career in immigration law, Rebecca has handled a broad range of immigration matters, including asylum, VAWA, self petitions, U visas and DACA applications.
Alla PolyastroHOST
1:47
We're so excited to hear what they have to share with us today.
Alla PolyastroHOST
1:50
So I'm now going to turn it over to them.

17 more episodes mention Violence Against Women Act.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.