United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts

The Bentley Brook Intervals Association, interval owners, man, why can I not say that today? Filed a voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy case on September 21st, 2026 in the U.S.

Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts.

The case is 26-30620 and is assigned to Chief Judge Elizabeth Katz.

For those of you that don't know, they aren't tuned in to Bentley Brook owners.

Over 70,000 job postings have included the question, and the plaintiffs in the case, including AFSCME, the American Federation of Government Employees, and the National Association of Government Employees, argued that its inclusion compelled applicants to make political statements and chilled the speech of those who may not agree with Trump's executive orders.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts found that continuing to include the question would cause irreparable harm to workers applying for government jobs.

Two state lawmakers want Oregon to ban flock cameras, the controversial AI-powered license plate readers that have sparked data privacy concerns and

bipartisan backlash across the country.

The revocation removes the basis for Moderna's earlier wins against BioNTech and Pfizer in Dusseldorf in London.

On September 15th, US sportswear maker New Balance filed a trademark infringement suit against Decathlon's US units, in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

The New Balance argues that the K logo of its K-Pran running shoe line, when mirrored, reads unmistakably as an N and imitates the N mark it has used for roughly 50 years, claiming post-sale confusion.

On September 8, the Court of Justice of the EU ruled in case C-298-23 that the owner of a well-known trademark, in this case IKEA, can prohibit its use by a political party unless the party sets out the specific reasons why its freedom of expression outweighs the trademark owner's interest.

Over 70,000 job postings have included the question, and the plaintiffs in the case, including AFSCME, the American Federation of Government Employees, and the National Association of Government Employees, argued that its inclusion compelled applicants to make political statements and chilled the speech of those who may not agree with Trump's executive orders.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts found that continuing to include the question would cause irreparable harm to workers applying for government jobs.

Two state lawmakers want Oregon to ban flock cameras, the controversial AI-powered license plate readers that have sparked data privacy concerns and bipartisan backlash across the country.

Alex Skarlatos, a Republican from Douglas County, and Willie Chodson, a Portland Democrat, plan to propose a bill in next year's legislative session that would indefinitely ban such automated cameras statewide.

DHS argued the change would strengthen oversight and address fraud, visa overstays, and national security concerns.

On Monday, Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in favor of a coalition of unions and higher education advocacy groups the day before the rule was set to take effect.

Judge Saylor postponed the rule and temporarily blocked its implementation, finding the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in showing the rule violated the Administrative Procedure Act.

The injunction leaves the existing system in place while the case continues.

Over seventy thousand job postings have included the question, and the plaintiffs in the case, including AFSCME, the American Federation of Government Employees, and the National Association of Government Employees, argued that its inclusion compelled applicants to make political statements and chilled the speech of those who may not agree with Trump's executive orders.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts found that continuing to include the question would cause irreparable harm to workers applying for government jobs.

[ding] Two state lawmakers want Oregon to ban flock cameras, the controversial AI-powered license plate readers that have sparked data privacy concerns and bipartisan backlash across the country.

Alex Skarlatos, a Republican from Douglas County, and Willie Chotzen, a Portland Democrat, plan to propose a bill in next year's legislative session that would indefinitely ban such automated cameras statewide, both lawmakers confirmed to The Oregonian.

It was March 31st of this year, 2026.

Two days later, the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts sue Trump in Massachusetts District Court.

The case was handed to guess who? Judge Inderija Talwani, who was, by the way, an Obama appointee.

Whatever.

And just to remind you, Justice Carl Nichols is a federal judge in Washington, DC's Federal Court.

So you have Judge Talwani in the Massachusetts Federal Court, and you have Justice-- You have Judge Nichols in the DC Federal Court.

So Judge Nichols, DC, Judge Talwani in Massachusetts.

Uh, the order goes on to talk about the background of the rule and what was being done here and what the Postal Service was providing.

So where does this basically take us at this point? It takes us to the point where this U.S.

Postal Service rule is blocked in a D.C. federal court.

It's blocked in a Massachusetts federal court.

A Trump-appointed judge, an Obama-appointed judge both agreed the Postal Service rule to try to tamper with and manipulate the Postal Service and the election ballots is invalid.