Tyson Hinds

Well, and the thing with the blue line is it was already so bad last year, but it was a bunch of older players who didn't really have any long-term upside, either ability to kinda grow and get better as the year goes along.

A lot of question marks this year undoubtedly heading into the season, but at least with some of these players, whether it's a Tristan Luna or a Tyson Hinds or even, like, a Pavel Minchkov still at this point after the extension he got, at least there's the possibility that they're just gonna get better and at least they can steer even further into what made them so effective last year, which was just that offense first, ramping up the pace, and going for it approach.

So I think it's really exciting.

Their star players also have such trademark skills already, right? Like Leo Carlson's sort of north-south bull rush drive to the net, Cutter Gauthier's shot and how beautiful his release is, the experimentation in Beckett Seneca's game.

Ouais.

Et Pavel Mintyukov, que moi, j'aime bien, ben les autres joueurs, un autre ancien choix de premier tour des Ducks, qui est issu du Québec, Tristan Luneau, Ian Moore, Tyson Hinds et Nick Jensen.

Tu sais, c'est vraiment avec Dostál en arrière.

C'est une équipe intéressante, mais c'est une équipe qui est axée sur ses vedettes.

Um, it's just, you know, it depends what Washington makes a, a priority, um, a- as far as what they're, what they're thinking.

And then I saw some of the other names, like Tyson Hinds I think would make Anaheim just based on the fact that they're gonna be thin on the, on the blue line.

And maybe out of the smaller player category, Justin Robidas.

Um, you know, Carolina's a good team.

Anton, Anton Walberg at seven.

And Tyson Hinds at six.

So do you guys agree with his six through 20? There was one or two players I'd probably switch up there, but I'm not fully in-- I don't fully know the whole prospect pool.

Um, like Pri- Patrick probably knows it way better than me, so that's probably why I agree with his.