Tyler Shandro
Solicitor and former Minister of Justice of AlbertaWikipedia
3
MENTIONS
3
EPISODES
3
PODCASTS
Search complete. 3 mentions across 3 episodes found for "Tyler Shandro".
Oct 22, 2026
Alberta Voted for.... What Exactly?
D
27:11Denys RobinsonGUEST
Of course, we did 25,000.
D
27:16Denys RobinsonGUEST
What happened was, as people learned more about the campaign, about the questions, and there are some really, really brutal parts of these questions, you know, like number four, I was at a talk with a bunch of conservative federalists and Tyler Shandro, the former justice minister, just completely went off about question four.
D
27:34Denys RobinsonGUEST
He said, do you know that this would take away healthcare from 80, it was like 85,000 Ukrainian refugees, refugees from the war who are on a special federal visa that counts them as non-permanent residents.
D
27:46Denys RobinsonGUEST
He says these people pay taxes.
EZRA LEVANT | The 25 per cent Ottawa can't ignore after Alberta's referendum vote
E
4:46Ezra LevantHOST
Then there was Vote to Stay.
E
4:47Ezra LevantHOST
That's Jason Kenney, Monty Solberg, Tyler Shandro, the old conservative establishment, basically.
E
4:53Ezra LevantHOST
Then there's the Canadian Chamber of Commerce campaign.
E
4:57Ezra LevantHOST
Co-chaired by Jason Kenney and Rachel Notley.
ep122: Polymarket Purgatory + Who Really Wants a Sovereign Alberta?
D
7:29DavePANELIST
The Sovereignty Act proposed to elevate the legislature above judiciary and grant it the power to determine the validity of federal laws, a function that it doesn't have the abilities or competencies to provide.
D
7:41DavePANELIST
Imagine, if you will, any of the rock stars currently in Daniel Smith's cabinet, Tyler Shandro, Devon Dreeshawn, Casey Maddow, among some of the bright lights there, having the power to decide what federal laws are valid or not.
D
7:53DavePANELIST
Very big brains at work.
D
7:54DavePANELIST
This is what's known as a Henry VIII clause, giving cabinet ministers the ability to just kind of decide and say out loud what laws should be, amend them or repeal them without any kind of public debate or even ceremony.