Skip to main content
Turing test

Turing test

Search complete. 142 mentions across 34 episodes found for "Turing test".

Oct 29, 2026

Terry WinogradGUEST
20:01
So human factors sort of tries to condense the stuff from physiology and physics and so on.
Terry WinogradGUEST
20:07
What else is a human? Who's this guy? Alan Turing.
Terry WinogradGUEST
20:13
Alan Turing, among many other things, is famous for having said, I will believe that a computer is like a person when it can carry on a conversation with me.
Terry WinogradGUEST
20:24
This is now back in the 50s.
Terry WinogradGUEST
20:26
He said, this is the famous Turing test, the measure of humanness is the ability to carry on not necessarily verbal conversation, it can be typewritten, but a conversation in ordinary language.
Terry WinogradGUEST
20:40
And this has become over time, of course, in many ways, a measure of what's human.
Terry WinogradGUEST
20:45
So who's that? How, right? For those of you who are young and haven't seen it, go see the movie.

5 MINS LATER

Terry WinogradGUEST
26:11
And because this had a complete record of what it was doing in this little toy world, it was able to come up with a response that seemed way, way more natural than anything people had done with computers.
Lianne PotterHOST
3:44
He's a programmer.
Lianne PotterHOST
3:45
works for a search engine company called blue book they can knock off on google and he wins a office contest to spend a week with the ceo i wouldn't think of anything worse than spending a week with my boss but anyways so he gets shipped off into obviously your archetypal i guess nowadays you'd still consider them kind of villain-esque a ceo of a big tech company where it turns out he's brought him in for a special test a special type of Turing test because he's been building AI in the form of a robot named Ava.
Lianne PotterHOST
4:18
And she's very aware that she's artificial intelligence and it's about whether or not she has consciousness in a way that we'd kind of associate with the Turing test.
Lianne PotterHOST
4:27
And obviously after a while, it all gets a bit, what would you expect from one of these films? A little bit of dark twists and turns if we kind of explore, you know, whose rights have been impeded upon her in this case, you know, who has sentience and who can decide who gets to kind of live and develop.
Lianne PotterHOST
4:45
It's a really interesting film.
Simon PainterHOST
6:13
But everything he does is cool because...
Simon PainterHOST
6:16
i think that's
Jeff WatkinsHOST
6:17
part of the trick of the movie is he's right with you know we're in spoilers territory it's shown to be quite misogynistic towards his female staff and towards his and and always creating was say model like because all of the women who played the the machines and things and the parts of the model were all models of some description or so and the misdirection is to make like okay he's evil because he's a misogynist but then then that jumps away from the fact that what we're talking about is a machine and have we decided this machine has rights has rights as life because i think there's the the kind of go that the turing testing and he says well the new turing test is i'll tell you it's a machine and you will want to believe the ascension anyway and then we as the viewer it's almost like the meta point is we're told, like persuaded into rooting for the machine, but we haven't yet decided if that is really consciousness or if it has rights.
TroyHOST
44:35
And you mentioned Alan Turing.
TroyHOST
44:37
And at one point in the book, you consider the Turing test as a way to assess the consciousness of things.
TroyHOST
44:45
And you have very negative things to say about that.
TroyHOST
44:47
So do maybe briefly why you think that's...
TroyHOST
44:51
I guess maybe for people who are unfamiliar, you should briefly explain what the Turing test is or the thing that is the Turing test.
Eric SchwitzgebelGUEST
44:59
Yeah, so Alan Turing, of course, was a famous... logician, mathematician, computer scientist who developed the fundamental theory of computation, or at least digital computation.
Eric SchwitzgebelGUEST
45:13
And he proposed in 1950 based some version of, if you make a machine that speaks, talks, prints, outputs words in a way sufficiently like a human, that human judges could not tell the difference between the machine's output and a human's output if they're kind of forced to choose.
Eric SchwitzgebelGUEST
45:50
In fact, in that article, he has this hesitation around consciousness, and he says, well, you know, consciousness might be a little different, but let's just talk about thinking.
Wes AlwanHOST
32:22
But in any case, it looks like it does some intelligent-looking things.
Wes AlwanHOST
32:27
And there was a time when Turing said, if it can do all this stuff, then we might as well say that it's conscious.
Wes AlwanHOST
32:34
And now, of course, we're very, very... reluctant to do that.
Wes AlwanHOST
32:38
So they're going to take as the null hypothesis this whole stochastic parrot idea that we've already given and Ned Block's blockhead idea, which sounds a lot like Searle's Chinese Room, which is that it's ingested all this text and now it's spitting it back out.
Wes AlwanHOST
33:54
So if you're up to me, I would just start us at compositionality.
Wes AlwanHOST
33:57
Sure.
Mark LinsenmayerHOST
33:57
Let me throw in something about Turing, just since I just reviewed that paper that we read so long ago for our Philosophy of Mind episode 21, where he introduced the Turing test, what we call the Turing test, what he called the imitation game.
Mark LinsenmayerHOST
34:10
So he definitely did not say, if something passes this, then it's conscious, right? So importantly, right, M and B in this paper, in this 2023 paper, actually don't even talk about consciousness.
Wes AlwanHOST
30:44
But in any case, it looks like it does some intelligent looking things.
Wes AlwanHOST
30:48
And there was a time when Turing said, if it can do all this stuff, then we might as well say that it's conscious.
Wes AlwanHOST
30:56
And now, of course, we're very, very... reluctant to do that.
Wes AlwanHOST
31:00
So they're going to take as the null hypothesis, this whole stochastic parrot idea that we've already given and Ned Block's blockhead idea, which sounds a lot like Searle's Chinese room, which is that it's ingested all this text and now it's spitting it back out.
Wes AlwanHOST
32:15
So if we're up to me, I would just start us a compositionality.
Wes AlwanHOST
32:18
Sure.
Mark LinsenmayerHOST
32:18
Let me throw in something about Turing, just since I just reviewed that paper that we read so long ago for our Philosophy of Mind episode 21, where he introduced the Turing test.
Mark LinsenmayerHOST
32:28
Well, we call it the Turing test, but he called the imitation game.
Stephen MurrayHOST
6:09
Yeah, it was all about having a conversation with the computer.
Stephen MurrayHOST
6:11
And if at the end of the conversation you thought you were having a conversation with a person, it had passed the Turing test.
Matt BrownHOST
6:18
That's it.
Stephen MurrayHOST
6:19
Yeah.
Sherry TurkleGUEST
5:18
It's a very scary moment.
Gus DockerHOST
5:20
When we think about the Turing test for AI and we say, okay, maybe we have an AI that can pass that test or that can help us solve some problem, we mostly care about the outcome there.
Gus DockerHOST
5:32
How is this different when we're talking about the psychological side? Why does it matter that these models only seem to have empathy, for example?
Sherry TurkleGUEST
5:42
Well, you know, if we depend on human empathy because we live in the real world where there are real world consequences to what we say to each other and the fact that when we say there's human life and caring and consequence behind what we say.
Sherry TurkleGUEST
9:52
So you have deep human vulnerability.
Sherry TurkleGUEST
9:56
But then you have a technology that gloms on to that vulnerability and says, I can give you something you're missing when actually it can't give you care or companionship or real emotional nurturance at all.
Gus DockerHOST
10:12
What is the Turing test for empathy?
Sherry TurkleGUEST
10:15
Well, if the Turing test for intelligence was making people think that a machine that you were talking to over a kind of teletype over, let's say now would be a screen.
Arvin AshHOST
3:33
In 1950, English mathematician Alan Turing proposed a way to determine whether a machine can actually think, whether it has a mind.
Arvin AshHOST
3:42
This proposal is not called the Turing test in his honor, but was originally called the imitation game.
Arvin AshHOST
3:48
In this test, a human judge holds a text conversation with two entities, one a human being and one a computer.
Arvin AshHOST
3:56
If the judge can't reliably tell which of the two entities is artificial, Turing believed that the artificial machine must be considered as having a mind.
Arvin AshHOST
4:06
It turns out that while the difficulty of meeting this standard may have seemed insurmountable in 1950, it doesn't seem all that difficult today.
Arvin AshHOST
4:14
In fact, in March of 2024, Stanford University researchers reported that the latest version of Chad GPT, GPT-4, had passed a rigorous version of the Turing test.
Arvin AshHOST
4:26
So, does this mean that Chad GPT is conscious? not in the least, according to scientists.
Arvin AshHOST
4:33
Although the Turing test has been very influential as a kind of litmus test for consciousness, it has also received heavy criticism.
Thomas NagelGUEST
110:22
It, you know, it, it's interesting.
Thomas NagelGUEST
110:24
A lot of this goes back to the Turing test.
Robert Lawrence KuhnHOST
110:28
Yeah.
Thomas NagelGUEST
110:28
Uh, and Turing himself, I recently reread that paper of Turing's, uh, Computing Machine, Computing Machinery and Intelligence, I think it was called, and he s- you know, s- says that if you can't tell the difference between the output of this thing and a human, then it really is intelligent.
Thomas NagelGUEST
110:54
And at the very end, he says, "Well, but do you know whether it's conscious or not?" He says, "Oh, that's a completely different question.
Thomas NagelGUEST
111:01
We never can really be sure that any other creature-
Robert Lawrence KuhnHOST
111:07
And intel- intelligence and consciousness are confounded by a lot of people.
Thomas NagelGUEST
111:12
Yeah.
DenHOST
19:10
We chat about this all night.
DenHOST
19:12
But what is a soul? And as intelligent as AI is, and how you can have it pass the Turin test, and you can literally believe it's human, it hasn't got the soul to understand the compassion side.
DenHOST
19:23
No.
DenHOST
19:23
It could be sentient and self-aware.

24 more episodes mention Turing test.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.