Skip to main content
Trump v. Hawaii

Trump v. Hawaii

Court caseWikipedia

Search complete. 6 mentions across 3 episodes found for "Trump v. Hawaii".

Oct 30, 2026

Andrew SteeleHOST
7:32
Those ideologies have been born anew in the form of multiple signature policies across Donald Trump's two administrations from the Muslim ban.
Andrew SteeleHOST
7:42
in connection with which, in 2018, Chief Justice John Roberts had the gall to claim in Trump v. Hawaii that he was overturning Korematsu v. U.S., while at the same time affirming its core principle, i.e., that racism is permissible in this country if you have power.
Andrew SteeleHOST
8:00
To now, in this administration, the revocation of temporary status just a few months ago for as many as 1 million people on the basis of explicit racial animus.
Andrew SteeleHOST
8:11
For at least the past year and a half under this administration, the United States federal government has literally been carrying out a policy of internment again, 80 years after its first run at it, imprisoning people without due process in even greater numbers than occurred during World War II, putting men, women, children, and the elderly in conditions that you would expect from dictatorial regimes in centuries past.
Emily NewmanHOST
6:26
We have a case going back to 1972 where courts will accept a facially legitimate and bona fide reason.
Emily NewmanHOST
6:33
And then Trump v. Hawaii in 2018 used that to support One of the travel bans that was during his previous administration.
Emily NewmanHOST
6:43
And then we had a Department of State versus Munoz case, which basically said a U.S. citizen doesn't even have a constitutional liberty interest in their own spouse's visa denial.
Stephen BrownHOST
6:56
Yeah, if I remember that case right, they had identified tattoos as gang symbols, which everybody said they, you know, the family and all, there was all this evidence it wasn't.

Unknown podcast

Rule of Law in America: Are the Powerful Above It?

Oct 13 · 4 Mentions

speaker_0HOST
9:18
Oh, okay.
speaker_1HOST
9:18
For example, Bank of America alone has paid $87 billion across 225 different cases.
speaker_1HOST
9:23
225 cases? Yeah.
speaker_1HOST
9:28
You see repeat offenders constantly.
speaker_1HOST
9:30
JPMorgan Chase, General Electric, HSBC.
speaker_0HOST
9:34
Wow.
speaker_1HOST
9:35
Public Citizen actually found that major corporations were given subsequent leniency agreements, sometimes four or more times in some cases, after they had already broken their previous agreements.
speaker_0HOST
9:46
Wait, this raises a massive logical red flag for me.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.