Tosefta

There's no real need from a fundamentalist standpoint to consider so-called extra biblical materials.

So for example, what would be some of the main extra biblical materials which one may consult in order to consider what a particular passage could mean? Well, certainly from a Jewish standpoint, different Second Temple Jewish and post-Second Temple Jewish materials would be things like the Mishnah, the Tosefta, the Talmud, the Midrashim, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Pseudepigrapha.

More familiar to people from Christian backgrounds would be things like the Apocrypha or the Pseudepigrapha.

Did I mention that? Okay.

Now, the Akhronim are very bothered by where the source of this Rambam is.

There's no Gemara, there's no Pasuk, there's no Tosefta, there's no Rishat.

Well, where is it? Right? We take their words for it.

And as he mentioned, says the source of this is in the first Gemara, tucked away in .

It's supposed to be.

That's a Tosefta.

That's a Tosefta.

The Pesach, it's like in the Beis Hamikdash.

The Pesach is here.

Zion here.

It says it's a Tosefta.

And Brochus.

Instead, it says...

Some say you're reading the Toseft in Bechorot that says, the parash of Beit

Menachem.

Ah, that makes sense now.

And our only problem is we just don't know which it is.

However, look at, well, we'll see Tosefta in a minute.

Now, notice that Tosefta here is, is going to, well, give us something to think about.

The Tosefta, it sounds exactly like the Mishnah.

It's exactly like the Mishnah.

It's almost exactly a copy of the Mishnah.

It looks like the Tosefta is a copy of the Mishnah, and again, the word, let's say, was left out.

So again, from the perspective of the Tanaitic literature that we have in front of us, and we'll see one more example, and the same thing, E.F. Schar is not about the same necessarily.

And this mitzvah, this is the mitzvah two different mitzvot, not like the one counted in one mitzvot, two different, not too much of a difference.

Then we discussed the Gemara Hazer Tosefta, that Hatzot Chalazan is the Maloche of Tzedon.

And Tyson says that Yerushalmi would appear that when you trap Chalazan, you don't violate Tzedon.

Why not? So the Pnei Yeshua explains, based on the Tisus in the first parik, that when you set a net, if you do a meloche on Shabbos, let's say, So you're harnessing a natural force.

You just find it in the sand.

So they say it's not such a kasha.

The Gemara quoted the Gersa in the Tosefta.

That means when you have to go diving in.

So the question is, is that the definition of mochek? So the Gemara says that mochek is mochomer v'kosev.

Because kosev is only, if you write shteyosiyas, The truth of the matter is that Tosefta says, if you have Sheva, then we shouldn't quote this Tosefta.

If you have a pinkos and you have shaiva, someone spilled some wax on top of the parchment, on top of the paper.

So you can't write everything.

So what's up there if he marries Danachris after she converts? Rabbi Moises says, if you only read the Gemara, you get that mistaken impression.

But if you look in the Tosefta, it's befarished that even if he was living with the woman, he's not allowed to marry her after.

Why not? What's going to be Hasamim Chaik Shispet? What's wrong over here? So he says, the rumor will be that her whole conversion was not the Shem Shammai.

And l'chad chila b'di ebed we're asking that a gerist that's not motivated l'shem shamayim b'di ebed it's a good gerist, but l'chad chila it's not proper to be in kavos ha-shigir.