Tonawanda Seneca Nation

According to FERC filing, the authority said the parcel is not needed for purposes of the power project, for public asse-asset-- access or for recreational purposes.

It also contains no archaeological or historic resources, a finding backed by the State Historic Preservation Office, the Seneca Nation of Indians, Tonawanda Seneca Nation, and Tuscarora Nation.

Patel previously told Business First that the project will be privately funded and that he has already secured money through private investors and will rely on institutional lenders for the remaining costs.

[coughs] Excuse me.

So we had talked about that as a possibility, but the way that a piece of clothing, a very special overdress comes into the show is through a woman named Caroline Parker Mount Pleasant Gahano.

She was a Tonawanda Seneca who was a bead worker primarily and She lived in New York State, and she made clothing for herself and for museum collections.

So we are borrowing this wonderful red canvas, it's cotton, overdress from the collection of the New York State Museum.

It'll be displayed alongside a daguerreotype portrait of the maker, where she's wearing, if not the same overdress, a similar overdress.

presence in the

gallery.

But we have her incredible overdress as well as a, beadwork purse that's similar to one that she's holding in the photograph and that will be displayed alongside some amazing watercolor representations of a Seneca Mission School and a group of Native American made samplers to show indeed Indigenous girls were also making these.

But I think we really wanted to emphasize a Native art form in the case of the beadwork and the Caroline Parker story that really showed how craft was being used as a tool, as a political tool, as a tool of resistance against assimilation and as a tool of, in the case of Caroline Parker, I think there's an argument to be made that the making of these objects was actually creating opportunities for the Seneca people to remain on their own lands.

And that was, that was more of a PG family film.

And, uh, I wanted to do that, you know, to do something different, you know, with back then with the Tonawanda Seneca Nation and people with Down syndrome and disabilities.

So but now I I with my art and filmmaking, I, you know, should say I wanted to do go a bit further and excuse me and do something a little different.

And that was Special Needs Revolt.

As experts documented, the project will not guarantee unbalanced low frequency noise or infrasound at levels detrimental to the surrounding community or wildlife.

Finally, the repeated claim that the GCEDC is not listening to stakeholder concerns and input, particularly from the Tonawanda Seneca Nation, is perhaps among the most egregious claims that continue to be published over and over.

The GCEDC has held over 15 hours of public hearing for this project and an additional 72-day comment period for the public to submit questions and concerns.

We have addressed all comments across approximately 100 categories throughout the review of this project, and we will upload the reports to the GCEDC website as soon as they are completed.