
The Supremes
11
MENTIONS
6
EPISODES
4
PODCASTS
Search complete. 11 mentions across 6 episodes found for "The Supremes".
Oct 2, 2026
Constitutional Clauses: Ex Post Facto
N
21:30Nia RogersHOST
could apply dangerously in the modern world if you had an overzealous.
N
21:36Nia RogersHOST
What do the Supremes say about ex post facto?
J
21:39John AughenbaughHOST
Well, this is interesting.
J
21:40John AughenbaughHOST
The Supreme Court has said the prohibition on ex post facto laws applies in the criminal law sector, but not in civil court.
N
25:05Nia RogersHOST
We have it – I mean we don't have it in civil law.
N
25:07Nia RogersHOST
We only have it in criminal law.
N
25:09Nia RogersHOST
And we're laying the groundwork for the Supremes being able to say what's constitutional and what's not constitutional.
N
25:15Nia RogersHOST
So how does it come to be applied?
John Yoo Wrote the Torture Memos and Never Paid for It. At All.
T
7:13Thomas SmithHOST
Anything Supreme, really.
T
7:15Thomas SmithHOST
The Supremes.
T
7:16Thomas SmithHOST
They've always been better than the course.
T
7:17Thomas SmithHOST
Oh, sure.
Monday, September 28th, 2026 - NATO Prepping Evacuation, SCOTUS OKs Trump's Shady Voter Rolls, OpenAI's Massive Security Problem
S
2:37Sami SageHOST
Just when we thought the Supreme Court had put Donald Trump's insane and invisible plans for the midterm elections to bed, they've somehow zombied them back to life a little bit.
S
2:46Sami SageHOST
The Supremes ruled 6-3 on Friday that the Trump administration can move forward with its plan to use a centralized database for DHS to verify voter citizenship through Social Security Administration data.
S
2:57Sami SageHOST
It's unclear how all of this is going to work, logistically speaking, with barely six weeks left until the midterm elections, but I suspect the chaos is the point.
S
3:09Sami SageHOST
Another day, another dumb construction idea.
Constitutional Clauses The Speech or Debate Clause
J
26:25John AughenbaughHOST
All right.
N
26:28Nia RogersHOST
A federal court rightly gave that a little bit of side eye because that had not been decided by the Supremes yet.
J
26:36John AughenbaughHOST
Yes.
N
26:36Nia RogersHOST
Gravel was reaching – gravel was grasping at a straw there.
N
28:06Nia RogersHOST
I don't either.
N
28:07Nia RogersHOST
I don't either.
N
28:07Nia RogersHOST
Okay, let's take it to the Supremes.
J
28:12John AughenbaughHOST
The Supreme Court, in a closely divided ruling in 1972, the vote was five to four, held that the privilege of the speech or debate clause did extend to congressional aides.
Tired of the ‘Tip’ - THU 9.1
K
6:16Kenny WebsterHOST
It depends who you ask.
K
6:18Kenny WebsterHOST
Check with the Supremes.
K
6:19Kenny WebsterHOST
You ask the North, they'd say yes.
K
6:20Kenny WebsterHOST
You ask the South, they'd say no.
Constitutional Clauses: The Recess Appointment Clause
N
28:20Nia RogersHOST
The medical world was like, what are you talking about? Yeah, yeah, yeah.
N
28:26Nia RogersHOST
I don't like it when the Supremes make stuff up.
N
28:28Nia RogersHOST
I don't like it when they make it up on either side.
N
28:30Nia RogersHOST
Like I'm not – No, yeah.
19 MINS LATER
N
48:00Nia RogersHOST
units are built that way.
N
48:03Nia RogersHOST
They're built that way by purpose.
N
48:04Nia RogersHOST
And one could argue the Supremes are built that way by purpose because the Supremes on a regular basis do things that the rest of us can't stand.
N
48:15Nia RogersHOST
We're like, what? That's the worst decision ever.