Skip to main content
The Supremes

The Supremes

Search complete. 11 mentions across 6 episodes found for "The Supremes".

Oct 2, 2026

Nia RogersHOST
21:30
could apply dangerously in the modern world if you had an overzealous.
Nia RogersHOST
21:36
What do the Supremes say about ex post facto?
John AughenbaughHOST
21:39
Well, this is interesting.
John AughenbaughHOST
21:40
The Supreme Court has said the prohibition on ex post facto laws applies in the criminal law sector, but not in civil court.
Nia RogersHOST
25:05
We have it – I mean we don't have it in civil law.
Nia RogersHOST
25:07
We only have it in criminal law.
Nia RogersHOST
25:09
And we're laying the groundwork for the Supremes being able to say what's constitutional and what's not constitutional.
Nia RogersHOST
25:15
So how does it come to be applied?
Thomas SmithHOST
7:13
Anything Supreme, really.
Thomas SmithHOST
7:15
The Supremes.
Thomas SmithHOST
7:16
They've always been better than the course.
Thomas SmithHOST
7:17
Oh, sure.
Sami SageHOST
2:37
Just when we thought the Supreme Court had put Donald Trump's insane and invisible plans for the midterm elections to bed, they've somehow zombied them back to life a little bit.
Sami SageHOST
2:46
The Supremes ruled 6-3 on Friday that the Trump administration can move forward with its plan to use a centralized database for DHS to verify voter citizenship through Social Security Administration data.
Sami SageHOST
2:57
It's unclear how all of this is going to work, logistically speaking, with barely six weeks left until the midterm elections, but I suspect the chaos is the point.
Sami SageHOST
3:09
Another day, another dumb construction idea.
John AughenbaughHOST
26:25
All right.
Nia RogersHOST
26:28
A federal court rightly gave that a little bit of side eye because that had not been decided by the Supremes yet.
John AughenbaughHOST
26:36
Yes.
Nia RogersHOST
26:36
Gravel was reaching – gravel was grasping at a straw there.
Nia RogersHOST
28:06
I don't either.
Nia RogersHOST
28:07
I don't either.
Nia RogersHOST
28:07
Okay, let's take it to the Supremes.
John AughenbaughHOST
28:12
The Supreme Court, in a closely divided ruling in 1972, the vote was five to four, held that the privilege of the speech or debate clause did extend to congressional aides.
Kenny WebsterHOST
6:16
It depends who you ask.
Kenny WebsterHOST
6:18
Check with the Supremes.
Kenny WebsterHOST
6:19
You ask the North, they'd say yes.
Kenny WebsterHOST
6:20
You ask the South, they'd say no.
Nia RogersHOST
28:20
The medical world was like, what are you talking about? Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Nia RogersHOST
28:26
I don't like it when the Supremes make stuff up.
Nia RogersHOST
28:28
I don't like it when they make it up on either side.
Nia RogersHOST
28:30
Like I'm not – No, yeah.

19 MINS LATER

Nia RogersHOST
48:00
units are built that way.
Nia RogersHOST
48:03
They're built that way by purpose.
Nia RogersHOST
48:04
And one could argue the Supremes are built that way by purpose because the Supremes on a regular basis do things that the rest of us can't stand.
Nia RogersHOST
48:15
We're like, what? That's the worst decision ever.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.