The National Law Review

basic bottom line of tort liability and certainly appropriate from a legal point of view.

Next up, from the National Law Review, why U.S. companies can't afford a U.S.-only lens when it comes to global AI and data compliance.

You can no longer take a U.S.-centric view and The insight now includes how employers can harmonize compliance across state-level U.S. and Canadian employment laws alongside the EU and U.K. regulatory positions.

So with the developing EU AI Act, the U.K. Act, and the plethora of state acts, it's going to be a mishmash, but something that employers must be ready to do.

Appreciate you coming on the show, sharing your wisdom, and, you know, we're gonna make sure we get you up.

If you guys don't know, this show is also syndicated in, uh, Above the Law and, uh, Attorney at Work and, uh, National Law Review on their YouTube channel.

So we've got a lot of different places where this show goes, and we just hope you're picking up on it one way or the other.

But thanks, Jaime, appreciate you.

According to Sidley Austin in their April 2026 report on PE and law firms, and I'll quote them directly, plaintiff-side personal injury firms often underwrite better than relationship-driven practices because client demand is consistent and can be generated through scalable advertising and digital channels.

And according to the National Law Review in February of this year, law firms with documented processes and strong non-founder leadership are the ones attracting significant investment.

The founders who actually exit for eight figures are the ones whose firms don't need them.

Their marketing is a system, their brand is the firm, and their lead flow is diversified and documented.