System

Like I, I think, I think building a startup, you know, it's a, it's a momentum game, right? We always tell folks, "Hey, if, if your company just raised a seed, you know, build momentum using every tool you have imaginable before you're re-relying on, on cold emails." You know, cold emails are something that works when you've got, like, a brand or if you're, you know, attacking a niche where other people aren't attacking.

But we, we just sort of came up with this different approach while building out the system.

system.So maybe it's a good point 'cause we got two kinda tactical areas we wanna dive into.

One of them is specifically how to sell into YC or Bay Area founders, and it probably works for any kind of founder geography that you find yourself in, how to sell to founders.

They're obviously a great set of early adopters for many different AI products.

If we were to observe the flying raven from the moving railway carriage, we should find that the motion of the raven will be one of different velocity and direction, but that it would still be uniform and in a straight line.

Expressed in an abstract manner, we may say, If a mass m is moving uniformly in a straight line with respect to a coordinate system k, then it will also be moving uniformly and in a straight line relative to a second coordinate system, k prime, provided that the latter is executing a uniform translatory motion with respect to k.

In accordance with the discussion contained in the preceding section, it follows that If K is a Galilean coordinate system, then every other coordinate system K' is a Galilean one.

When, in relation to K, it is in a condition of uniform motion of translation, relative to K', the mechanical laws of Galilei-Newton hold good exactly as they do with respect to K.

We advance a step farther in our generalization when we express the tenet thus.

We now proceed to the second argument, to which, moreover, we shall return later.

If the principle of relativity in the restricted sense does not hold, then the Galilean coordinate systems k, k', k'' etc., which are moving uniformly relative to each other, will not be equivalent for the description of natural phenomena.

In this case, we should be constrained to believe that natural laws are capable of being formulated in a particularly simple manner and of course only on condition that from amongst all possible galilean coordinate systems we should have chosen one k sub zero of a particular state of motion as our body of reference we should then be justified because of its merits for the description of natural phenomena in calling the system absolutely at rest and all other galilean systems in motion if for instance our embankment were the system k sub zero then our railway carriage would be a system k relative to which less simple laws would hold than with respect to k sub zero this diminished simplicity would be due to the fact that the carriage k would be in motion i e really with respect to k sub zero in the general laws of nature which have been formulated with reference to k the magnitude and direction of the velocity of the carriage would necessarily play a part we should expect for instance that the note emitted by an organ pipe placed with its axis parallel to the direction of travel would be different from that emitted if the axes of the pipe were placed perpendicular to this direction now in virtue of its motion in an orbit round the sun our earth is comparable with a railway carriage travelling with a velocity of about thirty kilometres per second if the principle of relativity were not valid We should therefore expect that the direction of motion of the Earth at any moment would enter into the laws of nature, and also that physical systems and their behavior would be dependent on the orientation in space with respect to the Earth.

If we were to observe the flying raven from the moving railway carriage, we should find that the motion of the raven would be one of different velocity and direction, but that it would still be uniform and in a straight line.

Expressed in an abstract manner we may say, if a mass m is moving uniformly in a straight line with respect to a coordinate system k, then it will also be moving uniformly and in a straight line relative to a second coordinate system k', provided that the latter is executing a uniform translatory motion with respect to k.

In accordance with the discussion contained in the preceding section, it follows that, if k is a Galilean coordinate system, then every other coordinate system k' is a Galilean one, when, in relation to k, it is in a condition of uniform motion of translation.

Relative to k', the mechanical laws of Galilei-Newton hold good exactly as they do with respect to k.

We advance a step farther in our generalization when we express the tenet thus.

In this case, we should be constrained to believe that natural laws are capable of being formulated in a particularly simple manner, and of course only on condition that from amongst all possible Galilean coordinate systems we should have chosen one, K sub zero, of a particular state of motion as our body of reference.

We should then be justified because of its merits for the description of natural phenomena in calling this system absolutely at rest and all other Galilean systems K in motion.

If, for instance, our embankment were the system K sub zero, then our railway carriage would be a system K, relative to which less simple laws would hold than with respect to K sub zero.

And therefore, I've never been kind of indoctrinated, and I don't know the ins and outs.

So if I'm going to go scheme up an 11P, you know, gap scheme, zone scheme, a pistol power offense, you know, whatever the system of choice is out there right now, most of them, you know, I've got, I kind of understand what they're trying to do.

The flex mode is one that evades me due to sheer boredom.

So I have to have episodes like this.

Neither one of us being total experts in it.

The important thing is...

in our systems and everything that we talk about on the podcast and everything that we teach inside JDFP premium coaching systems.

The questions I get a lot are, what do we do for the Flexbone or what do we do for the double wing? I'm like, tell me about your double wing.

Like, I honestly thought that this is the theme that I needed in my life, and if I needed it, surely somebody else needed it.

So the theme for this year is the power of systems.

Ta-da.

Like, how many of you guys had all the desires in the world to get so many things going, your fitness, your new business, your supervision idea of, like, what it would look like, your role as a BCBA, and clarify your role, and be a, a more successful, productive, all the things as a BCBA, but your systems keep breaking or holding you back from executing the thing you said you're gonna do? And so that's it.

We decided to just talk about it from a behavior analytic point of view, and tackle all the different aspects of your life that need to have systems in place.

Because it's not like...

I don't know how many of you guys that have this, that I have an amazing system at work.

Yeah

There was room for truly institutional platform-built setup.

Systems-wise, everything just shifted to the cloud, the web.

Computing was not what it was where it used to be a very difficult tech setup that you'd set up 15 years ago with a server in an office, with cubicles, with people that were put in cubicles because that's where you trusted they would work their best.

They weren't allowed to work from home.