Skip to main content
Supreme Court of Victoria

Supreme Court of Victoria

Search complete. 24 mentions across 16 episodes found for "Supreme Court of Victoria".

Sep 23, 2026

Scott WilliamsGUEST
30:07
In April 2024, her defence team was successfully able to have Ilkna released on bail so that she could undergo a sleep study to help determine the cause of her alleged parasomnia.
Scott WilliamsGUEST
30:21
While the results of the sleep study have not been made public, on February 4th, 2025, the Director of Public Prosecutions announced in the Supreme Court of Victoria that the case was being discontinued.
Sammy PetersenHOST
30:34
Wow.
Sammy PetersenHOST
30:35
Okay.
Chris EddyHOST
2:46
They've called on Premier Ben Carroll to apply robust guardrails to the significant developments that are already in place.
Chris EddyHOST
2:55
Boroondara Council has secured more than $50 million in compensation from the state government after winning a two-year Supreme Court battle over land acquired for the North East Link project.
Chris EddyHOST
3:08
The ruling awards the council nearly $20 million more than the initial offer for the 3.7 hectare Baldwin North Tennis Centre site, reports the Herald Sun.
Chris EddyHOST
3:19
Moonee Valley City Council Mayor Rose Iser has used her casting vote to break a deadlock and pass a $647,000 traffic management plan for Ascot Vale's Union Precinct.
Paul ConnollyHOST
26:25
So, the trial began in April of 2025.
Paul ConnollyHOST
26:30
Patterson stood trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria.
Paul ConnollyHOST
26:34
The trial lasted over two months.
Paul ConnollyHOST
26:36
50 witnesses were called and gave evidence.
Cameron SmithHOST
46:44
But effectively, going back to the former one, the Robbie Williams of it all, in short, the Australian Grand Prix organisers They failed to overturn a $2.84 million compensation order to a music producer over that concert cancellation.
Cameron SmithHOST
46:57
So the Victorian Supreme Court, they ruled in favour of Williams' camp back in 2024.
Cameron SmithHOST
47:04
That was then appealed by the Australian Grand Prix organisers.
Cameron SmithHOST
47:07
And today of recording, which is the 14th of September, that has been the judge has ruled in favour of Robbie Williams' camp.
Steven BrnovickGUEST
39:36
And where a decision maker is appointed by reason of their professional knowledge and experience, they cannot and should not be devoid of experience and inevitable preconceptions that their professional and personal work may bring.
Steven BrnovickGUEST
39:48
See Colonial Range Pty Ltd in Akrotidis, 2017, Victorian Supreme Court 337, paragraph 16.
Steven BrnovickGUEST
39:56
The test, really, the seminal authority on apprehended bias is Ebner and the Official Trust in Bankruptcy, 2000-205-CLR-337.
Steven BrnovickGUEST
40:09
And you might have heard of the double mark test, but essentially the test is this.
Claire HarveyHOST
0:19
Kate Sayers sued her husband for defamation after he alleged she posted lewd images on his social media accounts.
Claire HarveyHOST
0:27
The lawyer representing Luke Sayers read an apology to Kate Sayers in a Victorian Supreme Court hearing on Friday morning.
Claire HarveyHOST
0:34
The former Carlton president and PWC chief executive is believed to be traveling overseas.
Claire HarveyHOST
0:40
In the apology, Luke Sayers said he accepts his wife didn't make the post and apologized unreservedly for leveling blame at her.
Emma GillespieHOST
1:44
After spending years in a Syrian refugee camp, Zeynab Ahmad was charged with slavery offenses and taken into custody upon her return to Australia with other family members of former IS fighters in May.
Emma GillespieHOST
1:56
The 31-year-old mother applied for release in the Victorian Supreme Court, arguing she did not pose a risk to the safety of others.
Emma GillespieHOST
2:03
However, Justice James Elliott said he was not convinced Ahmad had abandoned extremist beliefs.
Emma GillespieHOST
2:09
He told the court on Wednesday her, quote, "extreme ideology in the past, coupled with extreme brutality of IS, means any related conduct, including indirectly influencing others, is potentially catastrophic.
Peta CredlinHOST
39:05
Coming up, words with Kel.
Peta CredlinHOST
39:07
But more now on the move by counter-terrorist investigators who submitted top-secret evidence to the Victorian Supreme Court in the case against alleged Avalon Airport hijacker.
Peta CredlinHOST
39:18
Now, the document that's been provided can only be viewed, we're told, by the judge It hasn't been made available to either party in the proceedings and it effectively calls on the Supreme Court not to reveal the identity of the, quote, foreign entities and a group that the teenager is accused of interacting with.
Peta CredlinHOST
39:40
well, this is interesting, here to discuss this and more News24 defence analyst, Peter Jennings.
Nawar HassanGUEST
10:17
I'll come back to what happened in that case later, but it's important to note in that case that very clearly the High Court said that at least at first, those documents, the expert reports and the affidavits, were covered by Harmon.
Nawar HassanGUEST
10:32
The leading authority in Victoria is a case called British American Tobacco and Cow No. 2, a 2003 case of the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal.
Nawar HassanGUEST
10:41
That case formed part of the Rolla McCabe suite of litigation.
Nawar HassanGUEST
10:46
Rolla McCabe had applied to have British American Tobacco's defence struck out based on BAT having a policy of destroying documents that could lead to liability.

7 MINS LATER

Nawar HassanGUEST
17:38
So it applies in VCAT, it applies in the Administrative Review Tribunal, and it also can apply in arbitrations.
Nawar HassanGUEST
17:46
So then the next question is, what is compulsory production? And on the other hand, what's voluntary production? It's very clear that if the document is not produced under compulsion, Harmon doesn't apply.
Nawar HassanGUEST
17:57
The first illustrative case of this principle is a case called Rowan Silverstein, a 2009 case from the Victorian Supreme Court.
Nawar HassanGUEST
18:06
That is a case that highlights the need to be very careful about how you produce information if you don't want it being used later on.
David KingHOST
26:53
Friday.
David KingHOST
26:54
It goes to court Friday in the, uh, Victorian Supreme Court.
David KingHOST
26:58
Now, I put it to you, Mr. Cornes.
David KingHOST
27:02
Now, I, I know it's a challenge for you because on Friday night there'll be a final in Perth, uh, in Adelaide.
Kane CornesHOST
27:07
That's a challenge, yeah.
David KingHOST
27:08
Is there an opportunity for us to get an emergency Fireball OB on Friday morning to the Victorian Supreme Court?
Kane CornesHOST
27:15
Well, we're...
Kane CornesHOST
27:15
The problem is we're in Perth on Thursday night.

6 more episodes mention Supreme Court of Victoria.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.