Supreme Court of Florida
CourtWikipedia
105
MENTIONS
67
EPISODES
60
PODCASTS
Search complete. 105 mentions across 67 episodes found for "Supreme Court of Florida".
Oct 31, 2026
Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing (Day 6 Part 8) (10/31/26)
B
3:02Bobby CapucciHOST
This is a phrase that is susceptible to overly broad interpretation, and we know that because the state is trying to apply it here.
B
3:10Bobby CapucciHOST
Similarly, in profit, the United States Supreme Court found the Florida Supreme Court properly construed the aggravator narrowly.
B
3:19Bobby CapucciHOST
The statute also had a knowing requirement.
B
3:22Bobby CapucciHOST
It was still reviewed, and it wasn't upheld based off of the knowing requirement.
Fifty Million, Once
I
2:30Ian KnightHOST
Marsh places the association's windstorm coverage with citizens.
I
2:33Ian KnightHOST
And the Florida Supreme Court describes the limit in a single phrase.
I
2:37Ian KnightHOST
A loss limit in an amount close to $50 million.
I
2:40Ian KnightHOST
Close to.
I
3:46Ian KnightHOST
We do not have the declarations page either.
I
3:48Ian KnightHOST
Nobody quotes it.
I
3:48Ian KnightHOST
Not the Florida Supreme Court, not the federal court.
I
3:52Ian KnightHOST
We have what the board was told about it.
Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing (Day 6 Part 8) (10/30/26)
B
2:32Bobby CapucciHOST
This is a phrase that is susceptible to overly broad interpretation, and we know that because the state is trying to apply it here.
B
2:39Bobby CapucciHOST
Similarly, in profit, the United States Supreme Court found the Florida Supreme Court properly construed the aggravator narrowly.
B
2:48Bobby CapucciHOST
The statute also had a knowing requirement.
B
2:52Bobby CapucciHOST
It was still reviewed, and it wasn't upheld based off of the knowing requirement.
Just How Bad Can It Get On Election Day?
D
18:21David F. WalbertGUEST
But I guess the first time, by the time Bush v. Gore came along in 2000, I'd argued a couple of voting rights cases in the Supreme Court, knew this stuff pretty well.
D
18:32David F. WalbertGUEST
And I said, okay, we're in good shape after the Supreme Court of Florida had ruled because there is no federal issue in the case
K
18:41Katherine RubinoHOST
for
D
18:41David F. WalbertGUEST
the Supreme Court or the federal courts to take jurisdiction on.
Jews for Jesus Asks Court To Strike Deficient Claim in Defamation Case
M
8:26Mat StaverHOST
The man eventually passed away and the estate of that man filed suit against Jews for Jesus claiming defamation and that any suggestion that the person might have been interested in Jesus was defamatory.
M
8:40Mat StaverHOST
We went all the way to the Florida Supreme Court.
M
8:42Mat StaverHOST
I argued the case, and we won.
M
8:45Mat StaverHOST
But the attorney in this case filed multiple complaints after that, amended the complaints.
Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing (Day 6 Part 8) (10/29/26)
B
3:02Bobby CapucciHOST
This is a phrase that is susceptible to overly broad interpretation, and we know that because the state is trying to apply it here.
B
3:09Bobby CapucciHOST
Similarly, in profit, the United States Supreme Court found the Florida Supreme Court properly construed the aggravator narrowly.
B
3:18Bobby CapucciHOST
The statute also had a knowing requirement.
B
3:22Bobby CapucciHOST
It was still reviewed, and it wasn't upheld based off of the knowing requirement.
494. What 50 Years of PI Trials Teach You About Reinvention, Case Selection, and $95M Outcomes | Ira Leesfield, Leesfield & Partners
I
12:09Ira LeesfieldGUEST
So we started this program, my firm, along with the recently late Chief Justice Fred Lewis, who tragically died two weeks ago.
I
12:18Ira LeesfieldGUEST
He was the Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court.
I
12:21Ira LeesfieldGUEST
and a great legal educator.
I
12:23Ira LeesfieldGUEST
And I got on the phone and called 15 or 16 of the judges, federal and state, and trial lawyer leaders and said, we're going to do this program called Classroom to Courtroom and make the transition.
The Desperate Arguments Behind the Push to Ban AR-15s
K
9:32Kostas MorosGUEST
And they said the NRA presented no evidence of that.
K
9:34Kostas MorosGUEST
But actually, we have one of the people from the legislature who later served on the Florida Supreme Court uh Judge Watson I think it was and in the 1940s he wrote that um yeah this this was passed because a lot of black people were getting Winchester's he said it straight out it's a we I cited in the thread I did on it you know there's an action it's in a court opinion from the Florida Supreme Court so I don't know maybe they didn't know about that or maybe they're just lying I don't know which but yeah that that's the you know when this brief opened by promising because this is a criticism I've long had of these Bowie knife arguments is like, why isn't there an argument as to Winchester rifles, which are the analog? And this briefs introduction promised, Oh yeah, we're going to talk about that.
K
10:14Kostas MorosGUEST
I'm like, great, let's see it.
K
10:16Kostas MorosGUEST
And what they have is disarming the KKK laws from the government saying you cannot take guns out of our armory.
Legal Horror Stories To Keep You Up At Night
K
4:26Kathryn RubinoHOST
And ethics complaints started piling up.
K
4:29Kathryn RubinoHOST
In Florida, more than 70 lawyers and former judges, including two former Florida Supreme Court justices, asked the Florida Bar to investigate Bondi herself for allegedly pressuring DOJ lawyers to act unethically.
K
4:41Kathryn RubinoHOST
Normally, the internal check on DOJ lawyers is the Office of Professional Responsibility, but under this administration, that office was gutted.
K
4:49Kathryn RubinoHOST
I think they're down to 17 lawyers.
Ep 274 — DOJ v. Voters
A
1:24Andrew TorrezHOST
Independent analysts who have done the math said that if the recount had continued, it almost certainly would have resulted in a Gore victory.
A
1:30Andrew TorrezHOST
The U.S. Supreme Court jumped in to overrule the Florida Supreme Court, make sure that recount stayed stopped.
A
1:36Andrew TorrezHOST
And man, we could do a deep dive on how nakedly corrupt Bush v. Gore was.
L
1:53Liz DyeHOST
Welcome to Law and Chaos, where the Comey family is in all the federal courts at once, and the Trump administration is trying to steal the vote in Alaska, and the Ninth Circuit just whacked a DOJ across the nose and told it to quit making a stinky mess on the floor.
58 MINS LATER
A
60:09Andrew TorrezHOST
What Gore sued was to require Florida to continue its recount, which had been halted by the state's Republican election apparatus, reporting to Jeb Bush, the brother of the candidate who stood to benefit from having the recount stopped.
A
60:23Andrew TorrezHOST
Independent analysts who have done the math said that if the recount had continued, it almost certainly would have resulted in a Gore victory.
A
60:28Andrew TorrezHOST
The U.S. Supreme Court jumped in to overrule the Florida Supreme Court, make sure that recount stayed stopped.
A
60:35Andrew TorrezHOST
And man, we could do a deep dive on how nakedly corrupt Bush v. Gore was and is.
57 more episodes mention Supreme Court of Florida.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.