Supreme Court of Appeal
CourtWikipedia
58
MENTIONS
38
EPISODES
20
PODCASTS
Search complete. 58 mentions across 38 episodes found for "Supreme Court of Appeal".
Sep 14, 2026
Asim AnyetheHOST
Let's get straight into it.
Asim AnyetheHOST
Did the Supreme Court of Appeal get the Oscar Pistorius verdict dead wrong? Retired advocate Chris Marnewick spent six years dissecting the 3,000-page trial record.
Asim AnyetheHOST
He tells Alec Hogg why he believes the public was blinded by social media groupthink, and why the final conviction should've been culpable homicide, not murder.
Alec HoggSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
How do you think that the public in South Africa, given the weight of opinion that, that wanted Oscar, if there'd been a death penalty, to get the death penalty.
Alec HoggHOST
What was the difference in, in law on those two, and what is the difference in the sentence?
Chris MarnewickGUEST
First of all, the, the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court of Appeal, found Oscar guilty of murder on the basis that he intended to kill the person he thought was behind the door.
Alec HoggHOST
So whether it was Reeva or not-
Chris MarnewickGUEST
Yes
Alec HoggHOST
he wanted them dead.
Chris MarnewickGUEST
Now, the trial court had found that Reeva, he thought that Reeva was in the bedroom when he fired those shots.
Chris MarnewickGUEST
That finding the Supreme Court of Appeal had to accept, because what, it was a finding of fact and they could not touch it.
Chris MarnewickGUEST
So the finding was specifically a- aimed at the person behind the door.
John MaythamHOST
And as you say, the Constitutional Court has said that Kiel de Boer is not hate speech.
John MaythamHOST
But the government could say that we are obliged to respect the decision of the Constitutional Court as are American politicians required to respect the decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
John MaythamHOST
But we would much prefer people not to sing it.
John MaythamHOST
We think it is disgusting.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
Hartzenberg's 17% and Jonas's 13% tribunal determinations were set aside and each appellant was declared 100% permanently disabled.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
Now at the Supreme Court of Appeal interestingly I wish they had pictures in these judgments.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
I really want to know what this kind of animal is that they're talking about.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
So the presence of the Chianina breed of cattle in South Africa has a long history.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
An animal breeder society promotes a specific breed and records and registered animals of that breed.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
It promotes the genetic improvement of the animal and applies breed standards.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
This appeal at the Supreme Court of Appeal concerns the registration in South Africa of this ancient Italian breed specifically the registration of the Chianina breeder society.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
Now the high court ordered the registrar of animal improvement to register the Chianina breeders cattle society as an animal breeder society.
Dan CorderHOST
They're not gonna be there.
Dan CorderHOST
The ANC has dealt itself a sucker punch blow, self-sabotaged, and basically already brutally harmed its election chances 'cause it's not even gonna be on the ballot come what may most likely after the Supreme Court of Appeal last Friday about the UDM, which we'll tell you about.
Dan CorderHOST
James, you know, I just, I know they didn't care about us, but they don't even care about themselves.
Dan CorderHOST
I- i- it is beyond belief that a political party would not submit thousands of candidates for a local government election, including in areas which they would expect to win.
Aubrey MasangoHOST
Mm.
Galeboe ModisapodiGUEST
One by the Labor Appeal Court and the other by the, uh, Supreme Court of Appeal, uh, both of which are very high courts, uh, just short of the Constitutional Court.
Galeboe ModisapodiGUEST
So the matter had to go to the Constitutional Court to be determined.
Galeboe ModisapodiGUEST
Now, one of the key questions which the court had to deal with was, uh, uh, what is the jurisdictional architecture in the Labor Relations Act? In other words, was Massmart right to proceed with action in the Labor Court or should it have gone to the High Court? Uh, so that was the one question.
Paul HoffmanGUEST
We ran a case for a long time, and they tried to bury us in paper.
Paul HoffmanGUEST
And eventually, after five days in the High Court, one day in the Supreme Court of Appeal, where we lost all ends up, and two days in the Constitutional Court, we won.
Paul HoffmanGUEST
And the court decided that the railways are responsible for the safety of their passengers and had to make arrangements to look after them.
Paul HoffmanGUEST
And so ever since then, it's been safer.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
Welcome to the Case Law Podcast this Tuesday, 8th of September.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
So the Supreme Court of Appeal gave us a neat case on separation of issues in a divorce case, CAB versus IKB.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
So these two were married in 96 out of community of property with the accrual system.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
After their marriage broke down, they concluded a settlement agreement and divorce proceedings ensued.
12 MINS LATER
Louis PodbielskiHOST
So the enforcement and execution of the arbitration award was set aside.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
And quality attorneys and advocate fair knee were provisionally ordered to pay the municipality's cost de bonas properties.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
they were afforded a few days to make submissions why that cost order should not be confirmed i can't see what they're going to come up with to avoid that cost order so um then also on tax um seesaws versus cornucopia trust at the supreme court of appeal Now, Cornucopia Trust, a South African trust conducting property investment and leasing in Bloemfontein, acquired two commercial properties financed by various Sunlum entities.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
So each facility that they had required payment of a raising fee, generally 2% of the capital amount, regulated by separate fee letters and payable to Sunlum Capital Markets.
LynnHOST
more than most executives expect.
LynnHOST
In automotive tooling systems against Wilkins, the Supreme Court of Appeal held that a person's skills and abilities are a part of himself and that know-how of that kind is not a proprietary interest vesting in the employer.
LynnHOST
Money spent on training does not buy the competence.
LynnHOST
The Labor Court applied it again in January.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
Nice win there.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
And a really nice case from the Supreme Court of Appeal on patents.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
We don't often see these.
Louis PodbielskiHOST
Now, it's Kiddos Dahlwerke versus Safety Engineering International.
28 more episodes mention Supreme Court of Appeal.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.