Stanford Law Review

And she has published numerous articles and essays about lethal injection over the last decade.

Her work has appeared in the nation's top law journals, including the Stanford Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, and Duke Law Journal.

Lane graduated summa cum laude from the College of William and Mary in 1992 and received her J.D. from the University of Virginia in 1996, where she was elected to Order of the Coif.

She clerked on the Tenth Circuit and then was a prosecutor for three years before joining the Richmond Law Faculty in 2001.

Uh, nothing comes to mind at the moment.

Uh, if you wanna read the article, it's on the Social Science Research Network and, uh, forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review.

And, uh, yeah, thank you so much for, for taking the time.

Thank you so much for taking the time, not once, not twice, but three times, Eric.

He was a civil rights leader in the greater LA area and worked a lot on coastal access specifically.

In fact, you can go and check out his, uh, Free the Beach 2005 article in the Stanford Law Journal, which is-

Yeah

... seminal conversation on, um, coastal access relative to California legislature and, and policy.

Americans in the 1860s recognized a third option, what we now call general law.

Those words suggesting a third way of constitutional law were from a article that came out a couple years ago in the Stanford Law Review, General Law and the 14th Amendment.

It is co-authored or tri-authored, you might say, by Judd Campbell, Steve Sachs, and Will Baude.

And we have Will here on our very first episode of Law Office History.

A related concern, I think, would be whether or not they're taking advantage of all of the money that's available to them through settlements.

And there is a article written in the Stanford Law Review about twenty years ago called Letting Billions Slip Through Your Fingers: Empirical Evidence and Legal Implications of the Failure of Financial Institutions to Participate in Securities Class Action Settlements, which is a mouthful.

The basic thesis there was that at that point in time, there were quite a few pension funds or other asset managers that weren't participating in settlements, and they were basically leaving money on the table as a result.

And there could be a whole bunch of different reasons for that.