Skip to main content
Southeast Asia Treaty Organization

Southeast Asia Treaty Organization

Search complete. 22 mentions across 5 episodes found for "Southeast Asia Treaty Organization".

Oct 17, 2026

Thomas777GUEST
106:57
Plus, they were geographically distant enough that even if America could base forces there in a frontal capacity, it wouldn't constitute a catastrophic threat or at least no greater a threat than, you know, surface warfare vessels in the South China Sea and what have you.
Thomas777GUEST
107:30
But the – as America took on the role of, you know, as per the Truman Doctrine of holding the line at the 17th parallel to preserve the status quo and, you know, getting commitments from the Republic of Korea as well as SEATO, superficial as that alliance proved to be in terms of its military capabilities and political will therein.
Thomas777GUEST
108:25
It had significance in terms of what was viewed as a legitimate application of force by America in a theater that theretofore had not been viewed as within its precedent of sphere of influence.
Thomas777GUEST
108:48
You know, this delicate minuet was something that Ho didn't really have to continue because by default you were in the Soviet camp if you were resisting the United States and you didn't need to really declare allegiance to commitments beyond that.
Thomas777GUEST
337:20
Um, and I don't want to have to like keep jumping back and saying, "Well, this is what this was." Um, people talk all the time about how Vietnam was like this grave kind of failure of collective security.
Thomas777GUEST
337:32
And why do they say that? Well, they say that because of SEATO, S-E-A-T-O.
Thomas777GUEST
337:37
Like, what was SEATO? SEATO was the Southeast Asian Treaty Organization.
Thomas777GUEST
337:42
And if you think it sounds a lot like NATO, you'd be right, because that's what, that's, that's what its whole notion was.
Thomas777GUEST
337:49
It was created by the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, also known as the Manila Pact, that was signed in September 1954 in, you guessed it, Manila, the Philippines.
Thomas777GUEST
337:59
Um, now who, who was the driving force behind SEATO? It was, uh, Vice President Nixon, who upon returning from Asia in 1953 said, "Look, we need some kind of collective security arrangement in Asia that, uh, you know, tantamount to NATO." Um, the, there was far more confidential conflict dyads in Asia.
Thomas777GUEST
338:19
Um, the strategic landscape was a lot more fluid, but, uh, and Nixon realized that.
Thomas777GUEST
338:26
But at the same time, he said that, you know, one of the reasons it's impossible to, uh, you know, develop a meaningful, uh, kind of strategic posture moving forward is because it's uncertain like what any, what if anything, you know, anyone's willing to commit and what, what they're willing to stand on as, you know, essential interests.
Thomas777GUEST
39:01
I got to come back to the point again and again, 'cause people act like Vietnam's this weird anomaly or this, like, unique and remarkable evil.
Thomas777GUEST
39:07
You know, like, we talked about s- the reason I raise the issue of SEATO, you know, S-E-A-T-O, Southeast Asia Treaty Organization, the 1954 dual accords of Korea and Indochina, and the Truman Doctrine, like, this was entirely congruent with US policy after, after the Second World War.
Thomas777GUEST
39:27
Like, the cost of waging the Second World War, among other things, was when these primitive as hell third-world nations, which in those days truly were primitive, like people living in huts, when they come under assault by Ivan, you go defend them, and your kids go defend them, and your tax dollars go defend them, and you lose those things.
Thomas777GUEST
39:48
I mean, that, this was very well understood, you know? Um, that was the Cold War.
ThomasGUEST
347:20
Um, and I don't wanna have to like keep jumping back and saying, "Well, this is what this was." Um- People talk all the time about how Vietnam was like this grave kind of failure of collective security.
ThomasGUEST
347:33
And why do they say that? Well, they say that because of SEATO, S-E-A-T-O.
ThomasGUEST
347:38
Like, what was SEATO? SEATO was the Southeast Asian Treaty Organization.
ThomasGUEST
347:43
And if you think it sounds a lot like NATO, you'd be right, because that's what its whole notion was.
ThomasGUEST
347:49
It was created by the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, also known as the Manila Pact, that was signed in September 1954 in, you guessed it, Manila, the Philippines.
ThomasGUEST
348:00
Now, who was the driving force behind SEATO? It was Vice President Nixon, who upon returning from Asia in 1953 said, look, we need some kind of collective security arrangement in Asia that, you know, tantamount to NATO.
ThomasGUEST
348:15
There was far more confidential conflict dyads in Asia.
ThomasGUEST
348:20
The strategic landscape was a lot more fluid.
ThomasGUEST
41:47
I gotta come back to the point again and again, 'cause people act like Vietnam's this weird anomaly or this, like, unique and remarkable evil.
ThomasGUEST
41:53
You know, like we talked about s- the reason I raise the issue of SEATO, you know, S-E-A-T-O, Southeast Asia Treaty Organization, the 1954 dual accords of Korea and Indochina and the Truman Doctrine, like, this was entirely congruent with US policy after, after the Second World War.
ThomasGUEST
42:13
Like, the cost of waging the Second World War, among other things, was when these primitive as hell third-world nations, which in those days truly were primitive, like people living in huts, when they come under assault by Ivan, you go defend them, and your kids go defend them, and your tax dollars go defend them, and you lose those things.
ThomasGUEST
42:34
I mean, that, this was very well understood.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.