Skip to main content
SN 1987A

SN 1987A

SupernovaWikipedia

Search complete. 29 mentions across 9 episodes found for "SN 1987A".

Oct 9, 2026

AveryHOST
7:59
It also fits a lineage.
AveryHOST
8:01
Raymond Davis and Masatoshi Koshiba shared a Nobel in 2002 for catching neutrinos from the sun, and from Supernova 1987A, the explosion in the Large Magellanic Cloud we talked about just a few weeks ago, still the only supernova whose neutrinos we've ever detected.
AveryHOST
8:18
In 2015, it was Takaaki Kajita and Arthur McDonald for showing neutrinos change flavor.
AnnaHOST
8:25
The next step is bigger ice.
AveryHOST
7:59
It also fits a lineage.
AveryHOST
8:01
Raymond Davis and Masatoshi Koshiba shared a Nobel in 2002 for catching neutrinos from the sun and from Supernova 1987A, the explosion in the Large Magellanic Cloud we talked about just a few weeks ago, still the only supernova whose neutrinos we've ever detected.
AveryHOST
8:18
In 2015, it was Takaaki Kajita and Arthur McDonald for showing neutrinos change flavor.
AnnaHOST
8:25
The next step is bigger ice.
Kirsty DuffyGUEST
45:23
[laughs] The problem with that, though, is, uh, it's happened once, 1987.
Kirsty DuffyGUEST
45:29
There was a supernova 1987A, and I think worldwide we saw something like 11 neutrinos.
Kirsty DuffyGUEST
45:35
[laughs] So, uh, we only expect a supernova of that size in our galaxy to happen once every 100 years, um, so everyone really wants to be prepared [laughs] the next time.
Hamish JohnstonHOST
45:47
Yeah.
LeonHOST
14:06
Oh, good question.
LeonHOST
14:07
Yes and no, in the sense that the data we got from Supernova 1987A suggests that the action happened over a period of just several seconds, like the core collapse and then the rebound and all of that.
LeonHOST
14:20
But because the star, by the time these stars explode, they're... hundreds of millions of kilometres wide because they've swollen up in their old age, the time it takes for the shockwave to travel out and for all of the actual chaos to take place is of order several weeks.
AliciaHOST
14:35
Right, okay.
SharnaHOST
14:58
Mm-hmm
LeonHOST
14:59
Uh, so the Supernova 1987A, as it was called-
SharnaHOST
15:03
Catchy name
LeonHOST
15:04
Yep
LeonHOST
14:56
And that happened inside the Milky Way galaxy.
LeonHOST
14:59
So the supernova 1987A, as it was called, happened inside the Large Magellanic Cloud.
LeonHOST
15:06
So it wasn't inside the Milky Way, but it was close enough, and it was the closest one astronomers had seen.
LeonHOST
15:11
And, of course, in 1987, you have to remember, compared to today where we have automated computers that will scan the sky every night looking at distant galaxies, to find a supernova back then was still pretty exciting news, and let alone to find one that was right next door.
JoshHOST
15:31
The Montreal Protocol was signed on September 16th, creating an international agreement to phase out chemicals responsible for damaging the ozone layer.
JoshHOST
15:40
Supernova SN 1987A was discovered in February in the Large Magellanic Cloud, becoming the brightest supernova visible from Earth in centuries.
DaveHOST
15:52
Hmm.
Baba LouieHOST
15:53
Very exciting.
AnnaHOST
7:42
Bi Li put the scale plainly.
AnnaHOST
7:44
Those one hundred and eighteen bubbles correspond to thousands of supernova explosions over the past forty million years.
AnnaHOST
7:51
Then the actual test.
AnnaHOST
7:53
From the bubbles, they calculated the rate at which supernovae are injecting kinetic energy between ten to the forty-ninth to ten to the fifty-one and a half ergs per cubic kiloparsec per million years.
AnnaHOST
8:08
Separately, and this is the part that makes the paper work, they derived the rate at which turbulence is dissipating energy from the same data using the observed motions of the gas.
AnnaHOST
8:19
Two independent numbers.
AnnaHOST
8:23
In magnitude, and this is the stronger claim, in spatial distribution.
AnnaHOST
8:29
It's not just that the galaxy-wide totals happen to agree, which could be coincidence between two quantities that both scale with how many stars a galaxy has.
AnnaHOST
2:27
All of these are real.
AnnaHOST
2:29
The question was never whether supernovae contribute.
AnnaHOST
2:32
It was whether they are enough on their own to pay the whole bill.
AveryHOST
2:37
And to answer that, you need to do something nobody had managed.
AveryHOST
3:02
Super bubbles are the fingerprints.
AveryHOST
3:04
Each one carries in its size and its expansion speed a record of how much energy went into it and roughly when.
AnnaHOST
3:12
So a complete dynamically resolved census of super bubbles across an entire galaxy would let you add up the energy supernovae have actually delivered and then compare it against how fast the turbulence in that same galaxy is bleeding energy away.
AnnaHOST
3:29
If the two numbers match, you have your answer.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.