SN 1987A
SupernovaWikipedia
29
MENTIONS
9
EPISODES
7
PODCASTS
Search complete. 29 mentions across 9 episodes found for "SN 1987A".
Oct 9, 2026
A Nobel in Ice: Unveiling the Secrets of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory
A
7:59AveryHOST
It also fits a lineage.
A
8:01AveryHOST
Raymond Davis and Masatoshi Koshiba shared a Nobel in 2002 for catching neutrinos from the sun, and from Supernova 1987A, the explosion in the Large Magellanic Cloud we talked about just a few weeks ago, still the only supernova whose neutrinos we've ever detected.
A
8:18AveryHOST
In 2015, it was Takaaki Kajita and Arthur McDonald for showing neutrinos change flavor.
A
8:25AnnaHOST
The next step is bigger ice.
A Nobel in Ice: Unveiling the Secrets of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory
A
7:59AveryHOST
It also fits a lineage.
A
8:01AveryHOST
Raymond Davis and Masatoshi Koshiba shared a Nobel in 2002 for catching neutrinos from the sun and from Supernova 1987A, the explosion in the Large Magellanic Cloud we talked about just a few weeks ago, still the only supernova whose neutrinos we've ever detected.
A
8:18AveryHOST
In 2015, it was Takaaki Kajita and Arthur McDonald for showing neutrinos change flavor.
A
8:25AnnaHOST
The next step is bigger ice.
Francis Halzen and IceCube: why neutrinos keep attracting Nobel prizes
K
45:23Kirsty DuffyGUEST
[laughs] The problem with that, though, is, uh, it's happened once, 1987.
K
45:29Kirsty DuffyGUEST
There was a supernova 1987A, and I think worldwide we saw something like 11 neutrinos.
K
45:35Kirsty DuffyGUEST
[laughs] So, uh, we only expect a supernova of that size in our galaxy to happen once every 100 years, um, so everyone really wants to be prepared [laughs] the next time.
H
45:47Hamish JohnstonHOST
Yeah.
Oct 26: Saturn's New Shape, Potential Dark Matter & Space Potatoes
L
14:06LeonHOST
Oh, good question.
L
14:07LeonHOST
Yes and no, in the sense that the data we got from Supernova 1987A suggests that the action happened over a period of just several seconds, like the core collapse and then the rebound and all of that.
L
14:20LeonHOST
But because the star, by the time these stars explode, they're... hundreds of millions of kilometres wide because they've swollen up in their old age, the time it takes for the shockwave to travel out and for all of the actual chaos to take place is of order several weeks.
A
14:35AliciaHOST
Right, okay.
October Night Sky: Meteor Showers, Giant Tarantulas & Moon Potatoes
S
14:58SharnaHOST
Mm-hmm
L
14:59LeonHOST
Uh, so the Supernova 1987A, as it was called-
S
15:03SharnaHOST
Catchy name
L
15:04LeonHOST
Yep
October Night Sky: Meteor Showers, Giant Tarantulas & Moon Potatoes
L
14:56LeonHOST
And that happened inside the Milky Way galaxy.
L
14:59LeonHOST
So the supernova 1987A, as it was called, happened inside the Large Magellanic Cloud.
L
15:06LeonHOST
So it wasn't inside the Milky Way, but it was close enough, and it was the closest one astronomers had seen.
L
15:11LeonHOST
And, of course, in 1987, you have to remember, compared to today where we have automated computers that will scan the sky every night looking at distant galaxies, to find a supernova back then was still pretty exciting news, and let alone to find one that was right next door.
Splendor is Back After 10 Years…Did It Deliver? The Dealer Traveling The U.S. To Grow The Hockey Hobby, Top 5 Very Early 2026-27 Artifacts Sales, A Shocking NHL Trade, A Scary Injury, Collectibles Forger Gets Busted & Personal Pickups
J
15:31JoshHOST
The Montreal Protocol was signed on September 16th, creating an international agreement to phase out chemicals responsible for damaging the ozone layer.
J
15:40JoshHOST
Supernova SN 1987A was discovered in February in the Large Magellanic Cloud, becoming the brightest supernova visible from Earth in centuries.
D
15:52DaveHOST
Hmm.
B
15:53Baba LouieHOST
Very exciting.
What Keeps a Galaxy Churning: Andromeda's Supernova Secrets Revealed
A
7:42AnnaHOST
Bi Li put the scale plainly.
A
7:44AnnaHOST
Those one hundred and eighteen bubbles correspond to thousands of supernova explosions over the past forty million years.
A
7:51AnnaHOST
Then the actual test.
A
7:53AnnaHOST
From the bubbles, they calculated the rate at which supernovae are injecting kinetic energy between ten to the forty-ninth to ten to the fifty-one and a half ergs per cubic kiloparsec per million years.
A
8:08AnnaHOST
Separately, and this is the part that makes the paper work, they derived the rate at which turbulence is dissipating energy from the same data using the observed motions of the gas.
A
8:19AnnaHOST
Two independent numbers.
A
8:23AnnaHOST
In magnitude, and this is the stronger claim, in spatial distribution.
A
8:29AnnaHOST
It's not just that the galaxy-wide totals happen to agree, which could be coincidence between two quantities that both scale with how many stars a galaxy has.
What Keeps a Galaxy Churning: Andromeda’s Supernova Secrets Revealed
A
2:27AnnaHOST
All of these are real.
A
2:29AnnaHOST
The question was never whether supernovae contribute.
A
2:32AnnaHOST
It was whether they are enough on their own to pay the whole bill.
A
2:37AveryHOST
And to answer that, you need to do something nobody had managed.
A
3:02AveryHOST
Super bubbles are the fingerprints.
A
3:04AveryHOST
Each one carries in its size and its expansion speed a record of how much energy went into it and roughly when.
A
3:12AnnaHOST
So a complete dynamically resolved census of super bubbles across an entire galaxy would let you add up the energy supernovae have actually delivered and then compare it against how fast the turbulence in that same galaxy is bleeding energy away.
A
3:29AnnaHOST
If the two numbers match, you have your answer.