Shabana Mahmood

Well, because there were so many stories.

Shabana Mahmood was going to be...

Yeah, lots of people were going to

be...

It beggars belief, and...

You know, there's the fact that this review is going to take, as the Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said, five months.

I mean, why does it need to take that long? The only people that benefit from these inquiries are usually the barristers that get paid.

Everybody could see with their eyes what happened when you have, you know, police training bodies and police guidance, police bodies releasing official guidance, basically saying that, you know, treating everyone the same is not necessarily equality.

Basically, what's happened actually? I think it was yesterday morning.

Andy Burnham was asked directly on Good Morning Britain whether he agreed with Shabana Mahmood's plan to extend ILR to 15 years for some migrants.

And he said he stands by the principle that she put forward, that settlement is a right to be earned, not just something that is granted automatically and that she will settle the final conclusion soon.

And they asked him explicitly, so do you endorse the 15 year route? And he didn't, he danced around the question very, I mean, you see, he's not as slippery as Boris Johnson.

But he did not commit to the 50-year thing.

Because he knows that a lot of people within Labour are very much against it.

A lot of people are saying Shabana Mahmood is on her own in many respects within the labor movement on this particular stuff.

People that Andy Burnham needs to please for his coalition to remain intact, people like Angela Rayner especially, are very, very much against it.

The paper says almost six in ten hospices in England are either made or are considering cuts to frontline services.

According to the iPaper, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is furious at Andy Burnham because members of the Cabinet were not warned before he called for a debate about a return to the freedom of movement within the EU.

A government source told the paper the Prime Minister's comments had undermined Mahmood's strategy to reduce immigration.

The Sun says restoring freedom of movement would be a catastrophe for getting the jobless back to work for wages, public services and social cohesion.

If you're wearing rose-colored glasses and looking at something rose-colored, you don't know whether it's the glasses or the thing.

Do you know what I mean? So with Shabana Mahmood, who knows whether she has a particular sort of sympathy because she is Muslim herself.

But the British

public hates this, right? But

But what was interesting is the divisions are there in plain sight because you can just look at what people have said recently.

Shabana Mahmood has said some quite sceptical things publicly about returning to free movement and broadly Brexit.

There was some comments that she made at Labour conference on it.

Lisa Nandy has been highly critical of it within the last five months.

Increasing the amount of time that people have to be in the country before they get permanent residence from five years to 15 years.

This was a flagship policy.

plan from Shabana Mahmood she really believed in it very strongly and obviously it's now open season you've had two cabinet ministers in particular come out and launched very strong attacks on the policy justifying it on the basis that well it's out to consultation so the policy could change I mean no no just to be clear you are attacking another cabinet minister's policy there is collective responsibility that's this is getting headlines because basically there is a bit of a pile on Shabana Mahmood and it's highly unusual to see that so publicly.

So that is the other aspect.

However...

Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, is among those Labour MPs who have previously been more cautious about closer ties with Europe, while a number of backbenchers with heavily pro-Brexit seats in the North and Midlands are wary about reopening the arguments for free movement or rejoining the EU.

terrifying terrifying stuff and actually politically honestly tone deaf right because we have restore and reform who are basically competing with each other to show the british population who can get a handle uh and secure demographic security for the rich people meanwhile you have andy burnham and labor party leroy jenkins more like free movement with eu what are you i mean i guess don't stop your enemy if they're going to make making a huge mistake like this but it's just it's You do not know what time it is, okay? You do not know what time it is.

Could the UK bend over any further to let migrants screw its citizens over? Of course they can, and of course they will.