Sarah Henderson

It's a great and a very important topic.

We've got Sarah Henderson.

We will be talking about that.

But I want to stick on something I thought you were going to say, which was the great example...

Well, so that's near Royal Barrackville that he's got the property, yes.

Well, I want to...

We've got that clip, which we're going to play to Sarah Henderson, but I think we should play it now because it does pick up on this hypocrisy thing.

And that is where Anthony Albanese, he made a big song and dance in Parliament about, oh, lots of jokes, it's 2.50 to join the golf club, I never go there, et cetera, et cetera.

This is Labor blasted over extremely dangerous digital duty of care bill.

Shadow Communications Minister Sarah Henderson warns Labor's digital duty of care bill is extremely dangerous.

It gives the minister unfettered powers to make regulations without parliamentary oversight in relation to categories of harm.

or serious harm, she told Paul Murray.

Shuts down the rights of Australians.

Henderson trashes egregious digital duty of care bill.

So the shadow communications minister, Sarah Henderson, says Labor's digital duty of care bill is an attempt to shut down the rights of Australians to have their say.

This is an outrageous attempt to shut down the rights of Australians to have their say no matter whether you agree or disagree.

Yeah, and as we got to the end of the week, certainly one of the major stories out of parliament was that Angus Taylor, the coalition leader, had said that the coalition won't support that bill in its current form because of concerns around free speech and government control over content.

What he says is that it would really enforce a sort of level of political censorship and When he did his press conference on Thursday alongside Matt Canavan and the Coalition's Shadow Communications Minister, Sarah Henderson, they said that the bill was an attempt to protect politicians rather than the public.

Yeah, Matt Canavan had some pretty strong words on this.

He described it as a virtual iron dome.

Well, look, uh, that one, uh, uh, my colleagues, of course, are going through the fine detail of this.

Uh, the problem is, um, these things can't be considered in isolation, and as discussed, uh, by Sarah Henderson, Matt Canavan, and Angus Taylor yesterday, the powers and, uh, the lack of guardrails around the powers the minister has when setting, uh, at their discretion what might constitute serious harm, for example, are where the problems lie for us.

There are too many unknowns around this framework legislation.

Uh, in terms of opt-in, opt-out, well, uh, you know, it is something that is definitely worth considering, but the problem is it isn't a standalone proposition.

Uh, and nor is there, uh, enough when it comes to empowering parents otherwise with other tools available to large organizations now, and Sarah Henderson has been talking about this for a long time.

The capacity for a large organization to manage what is consumed on a device it provides to an employee, for example, why don't we provide that to parents as well? That's the kind of thing we should be looking at.

But, uh, there are a lot of thorns in this legislation, and as stated, the coalition can't support it in its current form, and we'll see whether the government comes back to Sarah Henderson and my colleagues to see if there's a pathway forward.

Just on a separate issue, uh, regarding, uh, Andrew Hastie, your, uh, coalition, uh, colleague, and the One Nation, uh, cartoons, which have referred to him, uh, as a traitor.