Royce Lamberth
Senior JudgeWikipedia
16
MENTIONS
16
EPISODES
14
PODCASTS
Search complete. 16 mentions across 16 episodes found for "Royce Lamberth".
Oct 18, 2026
Chris PerrineHOST
The cuts were later challenged in court.
Chris PerrineHOST
In March 2026, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth ruled Trump's effort to wind down USAGM unlawful and ordered more than 1,000 employees back to
George BowenHOST
work.
George BowenHOST
This week in Amateur Radio is holding open auditions for news anchors for the weekly National Worldwide Amateur Radio News Service.
Glenn KirschnerGUEST
I went back and I tried to see, you know, what judges who are presently sitting on the federal district court in Washington DC have held government officials, government employees, or government agencies in contempt.
Glenn KirschnerGUEST
And Judge Royce Lamberth, you know, whom I know pretty well, I did a six-month RICO trial in front of-
Jim AcostaHOST
Mm
Glenn KirschnerGUEST
...
Peter LawrenceHOST
Isn't that funny? Late last week, Interior Department essentially said that it agrees that the key permits should be remanded and asked a judge to close the case against the agency.
Peter LawrenceHOST
The judge overseeing the request is Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court over the District of Columbia, who has previously sided with offshore wind developers.
Peter LawrenceHOST
that were forced to pause constructions last year under the Trump administration's stop work orders.
Peter LawrenceHOST
I think the judge will likely tell Trump buddies that the U.S. can't backtrack after billions of dollars has been invested and the U.S. government already okayed everything.
Adrian F. SneadGUEST
You know? And, uh, and, and in this city, uh, you have to impress people, but sometimes getting in the door is the hardest part, and I was really lucky to have a friend from undergrad that knew the chief judge of the federal district court here.
Adrian F. SneadGUEST
His name is Royce Lamberth.
Adrian F. SneadGUEST
He's still a, still a judge on the court.
Adrian F. SneadGUEST
[smacks lips] And, um, he got me in the door.
Michael CohenHOST
On the same day that QAnon Queen Greene called for more bloodshed to smite her political rivals, the so-called QAnon Shaman was sentenced to nearly four years in prison.
Michael CohenHOST
34-year-old Jacob Chansley, who became the face of the January 6th insurrection, was without his trademark fur pelts and was most definitely not carrying a spear as he was sentenced in federal court to 41 long months behind bars by Judge Royce Lamberth.
Jacob ChansleySOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
USA! USA!
speaker_17NARRATOR
For many, he was the face of the Capitol riot, wearing a fur headdress with horns, bare-chested, his face painted.
JRHOST
I predict his name comes up.
JRHOST
Today, Jeanette Vargas Hiacob, John McConnell, Juan Mershon, Kathleen McCormick, Louis Kaplan, Mary Moriarty, Matthew Barrett, Michael Nakamov, Mustafa T. Kasubai, Patrick Schiltz, Paul Engelmeyer, Paula Zenas, Richard Leone, Roberta Kaplan, Royce Lamberth, Scott McCaffrey, no, McCaffey, McAfee maybe, Sparkle Sukhnenon, Tanya Chutkin, Teresa Stokes, Tiffany Baker Carver, Tim Kelly, William Fitzpatrick, and Zia Faruqi.
JRHOST
How many is that? That's a long list of enemies within judges.
JRHOST
Enemies within judges who think they won the executive branch election.
Brett RowleyHOST
The newest one, the newest one, it will stay in.
Brett RowleyHOST
A court order by Judge Royce Lamberth, who was a Reagan appointee.
Brett RowleyHOST
Judge Lamberth, he ordered the administration to continue providing care to people with gender dysmorphia.
Brett RowleyHOST
In prison.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Although it's a close call, the court concludes that on the present record, DDF has not established that it's primarily engaged in disseminating information.
Bobby CapucciHOST
DDF argues that this case is comparable to Leadership Conference on Civil Rights v. Gonzales, D.D.C. 2005, in which Judge Royce Lamberth held that Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was primarily engaged in the dissemination of information regarding civil rights because its mission was to serve as the site of record for relevant and up-to-the-minute civil rights news and information, ID at 260.
Bobby CapucciHOST
The court, however, finds this case more akin to Landmark Legal Foundation v. EPA, D.D.C. 2012.
Bobby CapucciHOST
In Landmark Legal, Judge Lamberth held that Landmark Legal Foundation had not shown that it was primarily and not just incidentally engaged in information dissemination because it only stated that as part of its mission as a tax-exempt public interest law firm.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Although it's a close call, the court concludes that on the present record, DDF has not established that it's primarily engaged in disseminating information.
Bobby CapucciHOST
DDF argues that this case is comparable to Leadership Conference on Civil Rights v. Gonzalez, DDC 2005, in which Judge Royce Lamberth held that Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was primarily engaged in the dissemination of information regarding civil rights, because its mission was to serve, as a site of record, for relevant and up-to-the-minute civil rights news and information, Idea 260.
Bobby CapucciHOST
The court, however, finds this case more akin to Landmark Legal Foundation v. EPA, DDC 2012.
Bobby CapucciHOST
In Landmark Legal, Judge Lamberth held that Landmark Legal Foundation had not shown that it was primarily, and not just incidentally, engaged in information dissemination because it only stated that as part of its mission as a tax-exempt public interest law firm.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Although it's a close call, the court concludes that on the present record, DDF has not established that it's primarily engaged in disseminating information.
Bobby CapucciHOST
DDF argues that this case is comparable to Leadership Conference on Civil Rights v. Gonzalez, DDC 2005, in which Judge Royce Lamberth held that Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was primarily engaged in the dissemination of information regarding civil rights, because its mission was to serve, as a site of record, for relevant and up-to-the-minute civil rights news and information, Idea 260.
Bobby CapucciHOST
The court, however, finds this case more akin to Landmark Legal Foundation v. EPA, DDC 2012.
Bobby CapucciHOST
In Landmark Legal, Judge Lamberth held that Landmark Legal Foundation had not shown that it was primarily, and not just incidentally, engaged in information dissemination because it only stated that as part of its mission as a tax-exempt public interest law firm.
6 more episodes mention Royce Lamberth.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.