Although when the awards were first mooted, he had some questions.

Yeah, I think that it's important to differentiate two things, right? One thing is if people are interested in being awarded, and the other thing is how much the awards will change the clinical practice.

So I was not skeptical at all that people would be wishing to get the award, right? I mean, ev- most people want to be awarded.

Now, the question is, how much are they...

this is changing clinical practice.

And I think that in many situation it does.

Yeah, I think that, like, even in our hospital, we, we were kind of, like, a force, right? I mean, uh, to, to change the clinical practice because if everybody around you is awarded and then you are not, then you don't feel good.

So the idea is that it takes RESCUE, adds more digital tools and AI, and then it becomes an even more powerful tool to improve patient care.

Mm-hmm.

It's the access to data.

So we send the same contract to certain number of the hospitals, and this contract is accepted by a third of the hospitals.

It's rejected by a third of the hospitals, and there are certain modifications, something in between by the third of the hospitals.

If such a low agreement was a diagnostic test, it would be completely useless in medicine.

So we have the legal system, which is completely useless to support the research.

Sorry for being provocative, but this is how it is.

So h-what about RESCUE Plus? How are you addressing privacy, and how are you adapting to this European health data space?